The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies
Abstract
sult in a book that is highly relevant to both forestry practitioners and academics.Logjam provides a ªrst-hand understanding of the complex dynamics of international forestry politics and negotiations, illustrating what has worked, and what has not worked, in international negotiations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production
Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M., & Miguel, E. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15725 · Cited by 2,913
What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate-Economy Literature
Dell, M., Jones, B. F., & Olken, B. A. (2014) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.52.3.740 · Cited by 2,300
The Economic Effects of Climate Change
Tol, R. S. J. (2009) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.23.2.29 · Cited by 1,251
Hsiang, S. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009510107 · Cited by 992
‘Climate value at risk’ of global financial assets
Dietz, S., Bowen, A., Dixon, C., & Gradwell, P. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2972 · Cited by 694
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2008-11-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 46-1603-46-1603
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W624280243
- Cited by
- 1,239
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-1603
- The paper
- A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. (2008). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-1603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
