The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The illusions of entrepreneurship: the costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by
Abstract
There are far more entrepreneurs than most people realize. But the failure rate of new businesses is disappointingly high, and the economic impact of most of them disappointingly low, suggesting that enthusiastic would-be entrepreneurs and their investors all too often operate under a false set of assumptions. This book shows that the reality of entrepreneurship is decidedly different from the myths that have come to surround it. Scott Shane, a leading expert in entrepreneurial activity in the United States and other countries, draws on the data from extensive research to provide accurate, useful information about who becomes an entrepreneur and why, how businesses are started, which factors lead to success, and which predict a likely failure. The Illusions of Entrepreneurship is an essential resource for everyone who has dreamed of starting a new business, for investors in start-ups, for policy makers attempting to facilitate the formation and survival of new businesses, and for researchers interested in the economic impact of entrepreneurial activity. Scott Shane offers research-based answers to these questions and many others: * Why do people start businesses? * What industries are popular for start-ups? * How many jobs do new businesses create? * How do entrepreneurs finance their start-ups? * What makes some locations and some countries more entrepreneurial than others? * What are the characteristics of the typical entrepreneur? * How well does the typical start-up perform? * What strategies contribute to the survival and profitability of new businesses over time?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Should I Quit My Day Job?: A Hybrid Path to Entrepreneurship
Raffiee, J., & Feng, J. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0522 · Cited by 273
Mental Disorders in the Entrepreneurship Context: When Being Different Can Be An Advantage
Wiklund, J., Hatak, I., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2018) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0063 · Cited by 231
Ahmetoglu, G., Leutner, F., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.016 · Cited by 203
Power law distributions in entrepreneurship: Implications for theory and research
Crawford, G. C., Aguinis, H., Lichtenstein, B., Davidsson, P., & McKelvey, B. (2015) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.001 · Cited by 195
Who becomes an entrepreneur? Early life experiences as predictors of entrepreneurship
Schoon, I., & Duckworth, K. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029168 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2008-12-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 46-2184-46-2184
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1522043083
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The illusions of entrepreneurship: the costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-2184
- The paper
- The illusions of entrepreneurship: the costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. (2008). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-2184
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.