Cited by 231Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyWorkaholism, burnout, and well-being

Mental Disorders in the Entrepreneurship Context: When Being Different Can Be An Advantage

Open access
Wiklund, Johan, Hatak, Isabella, Patzelt, Holger, Shepherd, Dean A.·2018·Academy of Management Perspectives

Abstract

Mental disorders are prevalent, place considerable burden on the economy, and lead to suffering for those with the disorders and their loved ones. However, there is a flipside. Evidence suggests that people with mental disorders can flourish and productively contribute to society through entrepreneurship. This paper explores the relationship between mental disorders and entrepreneurship. It builds a research agenda to propose that researchers explore the role of mental disorders in the entrepreneurial context. We show how such research will advance this new field of research, but also how it can develop novel insights and theories in entrepreneurship and contribute to theories on the psychology of work, career choice, and clinical psychology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amp.2017.0063

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiklund, J., Hatak, I., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • University of St.Gallen (CH)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2018-05
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
182-206
ISSN
  • 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4529
OpenAlex
W2789066661
Cited by
231
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6
FWCI
24.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Academy of Management Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Syracuse University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
Keywords
mental illness, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial success, psychological well-being, career choice, work psychology, clinical psychology, neurodiversity, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review