The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice
Open accessAbstract
The Logic of CareWhat is good care?In this innovative and compelling book, Annemarie Mol argues that good care has little to do with 'patient choice' and, therefore, creating more opportunities for patient choice will not improve health care.Although it is possible to treat people who seek professional help as customers or citizens, Mol argues that this undermines ways of thinking and acting crucial to health care.Illustrating the discussion with examples from diabetes clinics and diabetes self care, the book presents the 'logic of care' in a step by step contrast with the 'logic of choice'.She concludes that good care is not a matter of making well-argued individual choices but is something that grows out of collaborative and continuing attempts to attune knowledge and technologies to diseased bodies and complex lives.Mol does not criticise the practices she encountered in her field work as messy or ad hoc, but makes explicit what it is that motivates them: an intriguing combination of adaptability and perseverance.The Logic of Care: Health and the problem of patient choice is crucial reading for all those interested in the theory and practice of care, including sociologists, anthropologists and health-care professionals.It will also speak to policymakers and become a valuable source of inspiration for patient activists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?
Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., Maskrey, N., & for the Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g3725 · Cited by 1,766
Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things
de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2011) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312710380301 · Cited by 1,511
Napier, A. D., Ancarno, C., Butler, B., Calabrese, J., Chater, A., Chatterjee, H., Guesnet, F., Horne, R., Jacyna, S., Jadhav, S., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61603-2 · Cited by 849
The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space
McFarlane, C. (2011) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d4710 · Cited by 746
Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2015) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312715599851 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 46-4482-46-4482
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1591387239
- Cited by
- 1,623
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-4482
- The paper
- The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-4482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.