The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Animal spirits: how human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism
Abstract
Neoclassical economics states that economic decisions about human behavior are based on figures, statistics, and assumptions, and that rational decisions made on the basis of these assumptions do not change under different emotional conditions.However, as Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman stated in their studies in 1974 and Prospect Theory in 1979, people have only limited rationality with heuristics and biases.While neoclassical economic assumptions prevents economics from being a true social science, behavioral economics tries to explain economic events by understanding people without isolating them from economics.The book entitled "Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism, " written by George A. Akerlof and Robert J. Shiller and published in 2009, deals with the factors affecting individuals in the decision-making process with a perspective other than neoclassical economic theory.In the first section of the two-part book, five basic motives (trust, justice, corruption, money illusion, and stories) are explained, while in the second section, eight questions about the economy are answered within the framework of these animal motivations.The importance of the book is its inclusion of animal motives in the economy that current theory fails to do so.In the book, while the econometric and statisticsbased models used by neoclassical economic theory to explain assumptions and economic phenomena are criticized, behavioral economic theory is put in its place.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The description–experience gap in risky choice
Hertwig, R., & Erev, I. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004 · Cited by 911
Mindful Economics: The Production, Consumption, and Value of Beliefs
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2016) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.30.3.141 · Cited by 817
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., & Vinck, P. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0279-x · Cited by 709
Imagined futures: Fictional expectations in the economy
Beckert, J. (2013) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-013-9191-2 · Cited by 552
Raafat, R. M., Chater, N., & Frith, C. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.002 · Cited by 479
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 46-6301-46-6301
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2163065315
- Cited by
- 1,447
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animal spirits: how human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-6301
- The paper
- Animal spirits: how human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-6301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.