Cited by 479Opinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems

Herding in humans

Open access
Raafat, Ramsey M., Chater, Nick, Frith, Chris·2009·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Herding is a form of convergent social behaviour that can be broadly defined as the alignment of the thoughts or behaviours of individuals in a group (herd) through local interaction and without centralized coordination. We suggest that herding has a broad application, from intellectual fashion to mob violence; and that understanding herding is particularly pertinent in an increasingly interconnected world. An integrated approach to herding is proposed, describing two key issues: mechanisms of transmission of thoughts or behaviour between agents, and patterns of connections between agents. We show how bringing together the diverse, often disconnected, theoretical and methodological approaches illuminates the applicability of herding to many domains of cognition and suggest that cognitive neuroscience offers a novel approach to its study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.002

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various forms of social contagion may share the same functional mechanism.

    “This suggests, in other words, that various forms of social contagion may share the same functional mechanism (Raafat, Chater, & Frith, 2009).”

    From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Raafat, Chater, & Frith, 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Richerson, P.J. and Boyd, R. (2005) Gene-Culture Coevolution and the Evolution of Social Institutions. In Better than Conscious? Decision Making, the Human Mind, and Implications for Institutions (Engel, C. and Singer, W., eds), pp. 305-324, MIT Press
  2. Shiller, R.J. (2000) Irrational exuberance, Princeton University Press
  3. Shiller, R.J. (2008) The subprime solution: how today's global financial crisis happened and what to do about it, Princeton University Press
  4. Akerlof, G.A. and Shiller, R.J. (2009) Animal spirits: how human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism, Princeton University Press
  5. Rickles, D. (2008) Econophysics and Financial Market Complexity, In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol.10: Philosophy of Complex Systems, Elsevier 16
  6. Buchanan, M. (2007) The Social Atom: Why the Rich Get Richer, Cheaters Get Caught, and Your Neighbor Usually Looks Like You, Bloomsbury Publishing 17
  7. Sumpter, D.J.T. (2006) The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B -Biol. Sci. 361, 5-22 22
  8. Dyer, J.R.G. et al. (2009) Leadership, consensus decision making and collective behaviour in humans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B -Biol. Sci. 364, 781-789
  9. Choi, S. et al. (2005) Behavioral Aspects of Learning in Social Networks: An Experimental Study. In Advances in Applied Microeconomics, Vol. 13, Behavioral and Experimental Economics, (Morgan, J., ed.), Berkeley, Calif.: BE Press 33
  10. Zimbardo, P.G. (2004) A Situationist Perspective on the Psychology of Evil: Understanding How Good People Are Transformed into Perpetrators. In The social psychology of good and evil (Miller, A.G., ed.), Guilford Press 45
  11. WispeI `, L. (1991) The psychology of sympathy, Plenum Press 46
  12. Derks, D. et al. (2008) The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 766-785
  13. Hatfield, E. et al. (1994) Emotional contagion, Cambridge University Press 53
  14. Russell, G.W. (2004) Sport riots: A social-psychological review. Aggression and Violent Behav. 9, 353-378
  15. Seger, C.R. et al. (2009) Subtle activation of a social categorization triggers group-level emotions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.,45, 460-467 doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.004 · DOI
  16. Cheng, A.T.A. et al. (2007) The influence of media reporting of the suicide of a celebrity on suicide rates: a population-based study. Int. J. Epidemiol.,36, 1229-1234 doi: 10.1093/ije/dym196 · DOI
  17. Hurley, S.L. and Chater, N. (2005) Perspectives on imitation: from neuroscience to social science, MIT Press 69
  18. Kawagoe, T. and Sasaki, S. (2006) Is Ignoring Public Information Best Policy? Reinforcement Learning. In Information Cascade (Braun, C., ed.), pp. 191-199, Berlin, Springer 75
  19. Sanfey, A. and Dorris, M. (2009) Games in Humans and Non-human Primates: Scanners to Single Units. In Neuroeconomics (Paul, W.G. et al., eds), pp. 63-80, Academic Press 79
  20. Coricelli, G. and Nagel, R. (2009) Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 9163-9168
  21. Dunbar, R.I.M. (1996) Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language, Harvard University Press 83
  22. Novelli, D. et al. (2009) Come together: Two studies concerning the impact of group relations on 'personal space'. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. Epub available on line June 11, 2009, doi:10.1348/014466609X449377 · DOI
  23. Freud, S. (1922) Group psychology and the analysis of the ego (English translation from Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse), The International Psychoanalytical Press 93
  24. Allport, F.H., (1924) Response to Social Stimulation in the Crowd. In Social psychology Chapter 11. 260-291, Houghton Mifflin
  25. Penrose, L.S. (1952) On the objective study of crowd behaviour, H.K. Lewis 96 Rogers, E.M. (1962) Diffusion of innovations, Free Press 97
  26. Newman, M.E.J. et al. (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks 18, Princeton University Press 102
  27. Guarino, A. and Cipriani, M., (2008) Herd Behavior in Financial Markets: An Experiment with Financial Market Professionals. SSRN eLibrary 106
  28. Farnsworth, W. (2007) The legal analyst: a toolkit for thinking about the law, University of Chicago Press 108
  29. Leskovec, J. et al. (2007) Cascading Behavior in Large Blog Graphs http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.2803 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raafat, R. M., Chater, N., & Frith, C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Raafat, Ramsey M.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
420-428
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102746067
Cited by
479
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Keywords
herding behavior, conformity, collective behavior, distributed coordination, local interactions, intellectual fashion, mob violence, social network structure
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Humans, Models, Psychological, Social Behavior, Cognitive Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review