The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Authoritarian backlash: Russian resistance to democratization in the former Soviet Union
Abstract
Contents: Preface The authoritarian backlash against democracy The external promotion of democracy and authoritarianism Political trends in the former Soviet Union: an overview Insulate: shielding Russia from external democracy promotion Redefine rhetorical defenses against external criticism Bolster: Russian support for authoritarianism in Belarus Subvert: undermining democracy in Georgia and Ukraine Coordinate working with others to resist democratization The Russian 2007-2008 election cycle The future of democracy and the challenge of authoritarianism Appendix Bibliography Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ambrosio, T. (2008) · Europe-Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668130802292143 · Cited by 318
Jackson, N. J. (2010) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569771003593920 · Cited by 98
Lewis, D. (2015) · Nationalities Papers · doi:10.1080/00905992.2014.980796 · Cited by 79
Freyburg, T., & Richter, S. (2015) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.1000875 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-10-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 47-1099-47-1099
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1486076281
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Authoritarian backlash: Russian resistance to democratization in the former Soviet Union. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.47-1099
- The paper
- Authoritarian backlash: Russian resistance to democratization in the former Soviet Union. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-1099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
