Fundamentals of Tree-Ring Research
Abstract
Although there are other scientific means of dating climatic and environmental events, dendrochronology provides the most reliable of all palaeorecords. This comprehensive text addresses all of the subjects that a reader who is new to the field will need to know and will be a welcome reference for practitioners at all levels. It includes a history of the discipline, biological and ecological background, principles of the field, basic scientific information on the structure and growth of trees, the complete range of dendrochronology methods, and a full description of each of the relevant subdisciplines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Robust Juniperus spp. tree-ring chronologies from Kültepe, Acemhöyük, and Karahöyük Konya securely crossdate following standard dendrochronological methods and evaluation, both within and between sites, and combine into a robust floating 300-year MBA juniper chronology.
“Robust Juniperus spp. tree-ring chronologies from three Middle Bronze Age (MBA) sites in Anatolia (Fig 2)–Kültepe (KUL) and Acemhöyük (ACM), plus one other site, Karahöyük Konya (KBK) [20, 23, 31] (and see Section A in S1 File)–do securely crossdate following standard dendrochronological methods and evaluation [32–39], both within and between sites with no doubt as to veracity”
From Integrated Tree-Ring-Radiocarbon High-Resolution Timeframe to Resolve Earlier Second Millennium BCE Mesopotamian Chronology (2016) · cites this paper as [34]
The part of the chronology linking Gordion and Porsuk contains very low sample depth-just 1 or 2 trees in the Gordion chronology-too few for any secure crossdating following standard dendrochronological methods, making the best available match highly tentative at best.
“First, the part of the chronology linking Gordion and Porsuk contains very low sample depth–with just 1 or 2 trees in the Gordion chronology (Fig 3, Figures A, B in S1 File)–too few for any secure crossdating following standard dendrochronological methods [32–35]”
From Integrated Tree-Ring-Radiocarbon High-Resolution Timeframe to Resolve Earlier Second Millennium BCE Mesopotamian Chronology (2016) · cites this paper as [34]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Manning, S. W., Griggs, C. B., Lorentzen, B., Barjamovic, G., Ramsey, C. B., Kromer, B., & Wild, E. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157144 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2010-11-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 48-1462-48-1462
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2108817398
- Cited by
- 1,316
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 85 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 39
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Keywords
- dendrochronology, tree-ring research, tree growth, tree structure, paleoclimate records, history of dendrochronology, tree ecology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review