The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fatal invention: how science, politics, and big business re-create race in the twenty-first century
Abstract
Fatal Invention documents the emergence of a new biopolitics in the United States that relies on re-inventing race in biological terms using cutting-edge genomic science and biotechnologies. Some scientists are defining race as a biological category written in our genes, while the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries convert the new racial science into race-based products, such as race-specific medicines, ancestry tests, and DNA forensics, that incorporate false assumptions of racial difference at the genetic level. The genetic understanding of race calls for technological responses to racial disparities while masking the continuing impact of racism in a supposedly post-racial society. Instead, I call for affirming our common humanity by working to end social inequities supported by the political system of race.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/669608 · Cited by 4,126
Hidden in Plain Sight — Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms
Vyas, D. A., Eisenstein, L. G., & Jones, D. S. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmms2004740 · Cited by 1,731
Taking race out of human genetics
Yudell, M., Roberts, D., DeSalle, R., & Tishkoff, S. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac4951 · Cited by 631
Self-citationSleep disparity, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic position
Grandner, M. A., Williams, N. J., Knutson, K. L., Roberts, D., & Jean-Louis, G. (2016) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2015.01.020 · Cited by 481
A Critical and Comprehensive Sociological Theory of Race and Racism
Golash-Boza, T. (2016) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/2332649216632242 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 49-2029-49-2029
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1483209340
- Cited by
- 1,028
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fatal invention: how science, politics, and big business re-create race in the twenty-first century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.49-2029
- The paper
- Fatal invention: how science, politics, and big business re-create race in the twenty-first century. (2011). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-2029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.