The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incognito: the secret lives of the brain
Abstract
*Why does your foot hit the brake pedal before you are conscious of danger ahead? *Why do you hear your name is mentioned in a conversation that you didn't think you were listening to? *Why is a person whose name begins with J more likely to marry another person whose name begins with J? *Why is it so difficult to keep a secret? *And how is it possible to get angry at yourself: who, exactly, is mad at whom? A thrilling subsurface exploration of the mind and all its contradictions. A NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, mental impingement across a dissociative boundary is empirically known.”
From On the Plausibility of Idealism: Refuting Criticisms (2017) · cites this paper as Eagleman (2011: 20-54)
In the citing paper
“while Eagleman (2011: 20-54) shows that dissociated expectations routinely mold our perceptions.”
From On the Plausibility of Idealism: Refuting Criticisms (2017) · cites this paper as Eagleman (2011: 20-54)
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceptual Learning: Toward a Comprehensive Theory
Watanabe, T., & Sasaki, Y. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015214 · Cited by 358
A comparison of classification techniques for seismic facies recognition
Zhao, T., Jayaram, V., Roy, A., & Marfurt, K. J. (2015) · Interpretation · doi:10.1190/int-2015-0044.1 · Cited by 266
Moravcsik, E. A. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511978876 · Cited by 222
Architecture, constraints, and behavior
Doyle, J. C., & CSETE, M. E. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1103557108 · Cited by 182
Reading the World through the Skin and Ears: A New Perspective on Sensory Substitution
Deroy, O. D., & Auvray, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00457 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Eagleman, D. M.
- Corresponding author
- David M. Eagleman
- ORCID
- David M. Eagleman
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 49-2368-49-2368
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1563197549
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- unconscious, unconscious processes, automatism, implicit memory, self-awareness, cognitive psychology, free will
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
