The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: a guide for students and practitioners
Abstract
About the Contributors. Acknowledgements. PART I Getting Started. 1 Introduction (Andrew R. Thompson and David Harper). 2 Identifying and Synthesizing Qualitative Literature (Rachel L. Shaw). 3 Ethical Issues in Qualitative Mental Health Research (Andrew R. Thompson and Eleni Chambers). 4 Participation and Service User Involvement (Alison Faulkner). 5 Qualitative Data Collection: Asking the Right Questions (Hannah Frith and Kate Gleeson). 6 Qualitative Methods for Studying Psychotherapy Change Processes (Robert Elliott). 7 Choosing a Qualitative Research Method (David Harper). PART II Methods. 8 Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Mental Health and Psychotherapy Research (Michael Larkin and Andrew R. Thompson). 9 Existentialist-Informed Hermeneutic Phenomenology (Carla Willig and Abigail Billin). 10 Grounded Theory Methods for Mental Health Practitioners (Alison Tweed and Kathy Charmaz). 11 Discourse Analysis (Eugenie Georgaca and Evrinomy Avdi). 12 Narrative Psychology (Michael Murray and Sally Sargeant). 13 Ethnomethodology/Conversation Analysis (Mark Rapley). 14 Q Methodological Research in Mental Health and Psychotherapy (Wendy Stainton Rogers and Phillip O. Dyson). 15 Thematic Analysis (Helene Joffe). PART III Establishing Good Quality Qualitative Research in Mental Health. 16 In Pursuit of Quality (Liz Spencer and Jane Ritchie). 17 Emerging Issues and Future Directions (David Harper and Andrew R. Thompson). Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis
Byrne, D. (2022) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y · Cited by 5,355
“Coding reliability approaches, such as those espoused by Boyatzis (1998) and Joffe (2012), accentuate the measurement of accuracy or reliability when coding data, often involving the use of a structured codebook.”
BackgroundMethodXu, W., & Zammit, K. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920918810 · Cited by 634
“TA aligns with these data collection tools that seek to explore the events, meanings, and experiences from verbal interviews and textual data (journal entries) generated by those experiencing them (Joffe, 2012; Vaismoradi et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialLooking behind the mask: Social coping strategies of girls on the autistic spectrum
Tierney, S., Burns, J., & Kilbey, E. (2016) · Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2015.11.013 · Cited by 316
From Therapeutic Factors to Mechanisms of Change in the Creative Arts Therapies: A Scoping Review
de Witte, M., Orkibi, H., Zarate, R., Karkou, V., Sajnani, N., Malhotra, B., Ho, R. T. H., Kaimal, G., Baker, F. A., & Koch, S. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678397 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 49-2986-49-2986
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W110605371
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: a guide for students and practitioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.49-2986
- The paper
- Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: a guide for students and practitioners. (2012). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-2986
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
