The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The design way: intentional change in an unpredictable world
Abstract
Humans did not discover fire--they designed it. Design is not defined by software programs, blueprints, or font choice. When we create new things--technologies, organizations, processes, systems, environments, ways of thinking--we engage in design. With this expansive view of design as their premise, in The Design Way, Harold Nelson and Erik Stolterman make case for design as its own culture of inquiry and action. They offer not a recipe for design practice or theorizing but a formulation of design culture's fundamental core of ideas. These ideas--which form the design way--are applicable to an infinite variety of design domains, from such traditional fields as architecture and graphic design to such nontraditional design areas as organizational, educational, interaction, and health care design. Nelson and Stolterman present design culture in terms of foundations (first principles), fundamentals (core concepts), and metaphysics, and then discuss these issues from both learner's and practitioner's perspectives. The text of this second edition is accompanied by new detailed images, schemas that visualize, conceptualize, and structure authors' understanding of design inquiry. This text itself has been revised and expanded throughout, in part in response to reader feedback.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240704 · Cited by 2,304
Bridging Design and Behavioral Research With Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling
Henseler, J. (2017) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2017.1281780 · Cited by 1,020
Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners
Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x · Cited by 891
Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse
Blevis, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240705 · Cited by 771
(2008) · International journal of design · Cited by 582
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2013-02-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 50-3065-50-3065
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W87429994
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The design way: intentional change in an unpredictable world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.50-3065
- The paper
- The design way: intentional change in an unpredictable world. (2013). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-3065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.