The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse
Abstract
This paper presents the perspective that sustainability can and should be a central focus of interaction design-a perspective that is termed Sustainable Interaction Design (SID). As a starting point for a perspective of sustainability, design is defined as an act of choosing among or informing choices of future ways of being. This perspective of sustainability is presented in terms of design values, methods, and reasoning. The paper proposes (i) a rubric for understanding the material effects of particular interaction design cases in terms of forms of use, reuse, and disposal, and (ii) several principles to guide SID. The paper illustrates--with particular examples of design critique for interactive products and appeals to secondary research--how two of these principles may be applied to move the effects of designs from less preferred forms of use to more preferred ones. Finally, a vision for incorporating sustainability into the research and practice of interaction design is described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2014) · The Reflective Practitioner in Professional Education · doi:10.1057/9781137399595.0007 · Cited by 8,325
Norman, D. (2016) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800648108 · Cited by 6,374
On understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1987) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(87)90026-9 · Cited by 3,677
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5559 · Cited by 2,342
The Computer for the Twenty-First Century
Weiser, M. (1991) · Scientific American · Cited by 2,113
Affordance, conventions, and design
Norman, D. A. (1999) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/301153.301168 · Cited by 2,040
THE QUESTION CONCERNING TECHNOLOGY
(2018) · Matter · doi:10.2307/j.ctt20ks1bm.5 · Cited by 1,949
Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science
Cross, N. (2001) · Design Issues · doi:10.1162/074793601750357196 · Cited by 1,420
The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.)
Simon, H. A. (1996) · Cited by 1,283
Allenby, B., & Graedel, T. E. (1995) · Cited by 1,192
Cited by
Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design
Bardzell, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753521 · Cited by 1,123
Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability1
Melville, N. P. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721412 · Cited by 868
The design of eco-feedback technology
Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., & Landay, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753629 · Cited by 813
Corporate digital responsibility
Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M., & Wirtz, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 · Cited by 573
The design with intent method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2010) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.001 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Blevis, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-04-29
- Pages
- 503-512
- OpenAlex
- W2168233682
- Cited by
- 771
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 176.97
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1240624.1240705
- The paper
- Blevis, E. (2007). Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240705
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
