The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Red tape: bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India
Abstract
Examining the chronic, widespread poverty in India, the world's fourth largest economy, Akhil Gupta theorizes the relation between the state in India and the poor as one of structural violence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hull, M. S. (2012) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104953 · Cited by 774
Dark anthropology and its others: Theory since the eighties
Ortner, S. B. (2016) · HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory · doi:10.14318/hau6.1.004 · Cited by 729
Caste and development: Contemporary perspectives on a structure of discrimination and advantage
Mosse, D. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.003 · Cited by 474
Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond
Sambasivan, N., Arnesen, E., Hutchinson, B., Doshi, T., & Prabhakaran, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445896 · Cited by 228
Leaky States: Water Audits, Ignorance, and the Politics of Infrastructure
Anand, N. (2015) · Public Culture · doi:10.1215/08992363-2841880 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2013-02-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 50-3376-50-3376
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2109346653
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Red tape: bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.50-3376
- The paper
- Red tape: bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. (2013). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-3376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
