Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The measurement of affect, mood, and emotion: a guide for health-behavioral research

·2013·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Prologue 1. Documenting the breadth and depth of the problem 2. Untangling the terminological Gordian knot 3. Should affective states be considered as distinct entities or as positioned along dimensions? 4. Are pleasant and unpleasant states independent or polar opposites? 5. Selecting a measure: a proposed three-step process 6. The old classics: measures of distinct states 7. Dimensional measures 8. Domain-specific measurement: challenges and solutions 9. Problems of domain specificity: examples from exercise Epilogue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.51-2369

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2013-11-18
Volume
51
Issue
04
Pages
51-2369-51-2369
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W614096023
Cited by
264
References
1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The measurement of affect, mood, and emotion: a guide for health-behavioral research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.51-2369
The paper
The measurement of affect, mood, and emotion: a guide for health-behavioral research. (2013). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-2369

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.