The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Encyclopedia of Biodiversity
Abstract
First used in 1980, often describes the abundance, variety, and genetic constitution of native animals and plants, and has been linked with politics and environmental technology. Although the 1986 National forum on biodiversity brought issues of biodiversity to the fore, the inescapable need to know more about the diversity of life on Earth continues to remain unmet. In recent years, biodiversity has influenced important scientific considerations, international agreements, conventions, conservation initiatives, political debates, and socio-economic implications. Knowledge derived from the study of biodiversity will affect the quality of life enjoyed in the future by influencing decision-making processes and aiding new discoveries. science of biodiversity has become the science of our future. Our awareness of the loss of biodiversity has brought a long overdue appreciation of the magnitude of our loss and a determination to develop the tools to protect our future. The Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, 2/e has been updated to provide a timely study of the dimensions of diversity. It examines the services biodiversity provides, and the measures in which to protect it. Major themes of the work include the evolution of biodiversity, systems for classifying and defining biodiversity, ecological patterns and theories of biodiversity, and an assessment of contemporary patterns and trends in biodiversity. This Revised edition includes over 100 new articles and 226 updated articles covering this multidisciplinary field - from evolution to habits to economics. editors for this second edition are all well respected, instantly recognizable academics operating at the top of their respective fields in biodiversity research. Readers can be assured that they are reading material that has been meticulously checked and reviewed by experts. Approximately 1,000 figures and tables complement the text, and more than 3,000 glossary entries explain key terms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes
Dı́az, S., & Cabido, M. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02283-2 · Cited by 3,306
Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts
Bernhardt, E. S., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., Alexander, G., Barnas, K., Brooks, S., Carr, J., Clayton, S., Dahm, C., Follstad-Shah, J., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1109769 · Cited by 1,903
Global State of Biodiversity and Loss
Dirzo, R., & Raven, P. H. (2003) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105532 · Cited by 1,366
New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems
HUGHES, T., BELLWOOD, D., FOLKE, C., STENECK, R., & WILSON, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.022 · Cited by 980
Vertebrates on the brink as indicators of biological annihilation and the sixth mass extinction
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., & Raven, P. H. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1922686117 · Cited by 926
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2014-03-20
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 51-4189-51-4189
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1564267775
- Cited by
- 922
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.51-4189
- The paper
- Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. (2014). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-4189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.