Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Conceptual Analysis and Historical Overview of Information Literacy

Open access
Behrens, Shirley J.·1994·College & Research Libraries

Abstract

A conceptual analysis is undertaken of information literacy by investigating some leading definitions and delineations of the concept. These are analyzed with the intention of exploring chronological extensions in the meaning of the concept. The range of skills and knowledge required for information literacy has. expanded over the last two decades in order to accommodate the continually developing requirements for effective information handling, and the article notes how the library and information science (LIS) profession is responding to these requirements. The review concludes by identifying three main trends in information literacy which are evident from the literature of the early 1990s. H nformation literacy is an abstract concept. As a metaphor, it is a neatly packaged-and imagi-- nativ~escriptive phrase that is not literally applicable or easily interpretable, implying something more qualitative and diffuse than is evident in the historical meanings of both literacy and information. Symbolically, information lit-eracy appears to represent the ability to use information, or possibly the posses-sion of a knowledge of information. In order to ascertain how the concept has come to have its current meaning and to identify what skills and knowl-edge are required of a person in order to be information literate, some definitions suggested since the 1970s will be ana-lyzed. At the same time, the future sce-nario for information literacy in the LIS field will be outlined by identifying what the current trends appear to be from the latest literature. Owing to the abundance of literature on information literacy, only a few of the major definitions can be analyzed for the purposes of this article.1 The review con-centrates on literature emanating from the United States; however, for purposes of comparison, reference is made to some definitions discussed in the Nether-lands, since the Dutch meaning of infor-mation literacy was originally more computer-oriented, but now appears to be moving closer to the meaning ascribed to the concept in the United States. DEFINITIONS OF THE 1970s In a proposal submitted to the Na-tional Commission on Libraries and In-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/crl_55_04_309

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Behrens, S. J.
Venue
College & Research Libraries
Published
1994-07-01
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
309-322
ISSN
  • 0010-0870 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6701
OpenAlex
W2003885727
Cited by
366
References
9
FWCI
25.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Conceptual Analysis and Historical Overview of Information Literacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/crl_55_04_309
The paper
Behrens, S. J. (1994). A Conceptual Analysis and Historical Overview of Information Literacy. College & Research Libraries. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_55_04_309

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.