Cited by 17Public Relations and Crisis CommunicationDisaster Management and ResilienceRisk Perception and Management

Risk Information Seeking Behavior in Disaster Resettlement: A Case Study of Ankang City, China

Open access
Shi, Jia, Hu, Xiangnan, Guo, Xuesong, Lian, Cuihong·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

In 2011, the Chinese government launched a disaster mitigation and preparedness program called the Resettlement of South Shaanxi (RSS). Due to the wide geographical scope and complex interests, the possibility of conflicts was increased during and after resettlement. Efficient risk communication improves the supply of information about risks and meets the risk-related information needs of individuals. Using the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model, this research applied a structural equation model and survey with a structured questionnaire to study ways to improve risk communication in disaster resettlement. A total of 616 valid questionnaires were provided by study respondents in resettlement sites in Ziyang County, Ankang City, Shaanxi Province. The results indicated the following: (1) the public’s information seeking behavior relies more on village committees and village officials than other channels. Emerging information channels, such as Weibo and WeChat (social media applications in China), do not play leading roles in disseminating risk information. (2) There are differences between the information channels used by residents and the channels that residents believe the most. (3) Relevant channel beliefs, information sufficiency, perceived hazard characteristics, and self-efficacy directly influence risk information seeking behavior. However, the capacity to gather information has non-significant direct influences on information seeking behavior. (4) Perceived hazard characteristics and self-efficacy drive risk information seeking behavior in both direct and indirect ways through information sufficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17197352

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior, Open University Press.
  2. Greenberg, B.S., Hofshire, L., and Lachlan, K.A. (2002). Diffusion, Media Use, and Interpersonal Communication Behavior, Hampton Press.
  3. Slovic, 1992, Perceptions of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm, Social Theories of Risk, Volume 236, 117

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, J., Hu, X., Guo, X., & Lian, C.
Affiliations
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Xuesong
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-08
Volume
17
Issue
19
Pages
7352
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092427509
Cited by
17
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Shaanxi Provincial Project of Soft Science Fund (No. 2020KRM065; No. 2019KRM069)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. SK2020039)
  • Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. 2019E002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
risk information seeking, risk communication, risk information seeking and processing model, information sufficiency, self-efficacy, information channels, village committees, social media, post-disaster relocation, Ankang City
MeSH terms
China, Disasters, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Information Seeking Behavior, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review