Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Knowledge, Literacy, and the Common Core

Cervetti, Gina, Hiebert, Elfrieda H.·2015·Language Arts

Abstract

The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) represent a fundamental shift toward the inclusion of more informational texts and related instruction, beginning in kindergarten. It would be possible to respond to the call for more attention to informational texts in the CCSS by simply changing the balance of different text types used for instructional purposes. In this article, we discuss why we should instead focus on using the opportunity of reading more informational texts to build students' disciplinary and world knowledge. We suggest that the critical message of the CCSS is the need to support students in developing knowledge for and through reading. We describe themes from the existing research about the relationship between knowledge and reading comprehension and describe critical dimensions of knowledge-enhancing English Language Arts Instruction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.58680/la201526914

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Cervetti, G., & Hiebert, E. H.
Venue
Language Arts
Published
2015-03-01
Volume
92
Issue
4
Pages
256-269
ISSN
  • 0360-9170
  • 1943-2402
Cited by
20
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge, Literacy, and the Common Core. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.58680/la201526914
The paper
Cervetti, G., & Hiebert, E. H. (2015). Knowledge, Literacy, and the Common Core. Language Arts. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201526914

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.