The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surplus: The Politics of Production and the Strategies of Everyday Life: An Introduction
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The circulation of goods and services, regardless of motive, was often nested and blended together.
“the circulation of goods and services, regardless of motive, was often nested and blended together (Chirikure 2017;Morehart and De Lucia 2015;Stahl 2015).”
From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Morehart and De Lucia 2015
The idea of surplus representing only goods in excess of consumption requirements does not always apply.
“Therefore, the idea of surplus representing only goods in excess of consumption requirements (Morehart and De Lucia 2015) does not always apply.”
From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Morehart and De Lucia 2015
Citations
Cites
Introduction: commodities and the politics of value
Appadurai, A. (1986) · The Social Life of Things · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819582.003 · Cited by 4,001
Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber
Giddens, A. (1971) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803109 · Cited by 1,298
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe
Chirikure, S. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-019-09133-w · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Morehart, C. T., & De Lucia, K.
- Venue
- Surplus: The Politics of Production and the Strategies of Everyday Life
- Publisher
- University Press of Colorado
- Published
- 2015
- Pages
- 3-43
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
