The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Chronic Care Model and Diabetes Management in US Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: The Chronic Care Model (CCM) uses a systematic approach to restructuring medical care to create partnerships between health systems and communities. The objective of this study was to describe how researchers have applied CCM in US primary care settings to provide care for people who have diabetes and to describe outcomes of CCM implementation. METHODS: We conducted a literature review by using the Cochrane database of systematic reviews, CINAHL, and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition and the following search terms: "chronic care model" (and) "diabet*." We included articles published between January 1999 and October 2011. We summarized details on CCM application and health outcomes for 16 studies. RESULTS: The 16 studies included various study designs, including 9 randomized controlled trials, and settings, including academic-affiliated primary care practices and private practices. We found evidence that CCM approaches have been effective in managing diabetes in US primary care settings. Organizational leaders in health care systems initiated system-level reorganizations that improved the coordination of diabetes care. Disease registries and electronic medical records were used to establish patient-centered goals, monitor patient progress, and identify lapses in care. Primary care physicians (PCPs) were trained to deliver evidence-based care, and PCP officd-based diabetes self-management education improved patient outcomes. Only 7 studies described strategies for addressing community resources and policies. CONCLUSION: CCM is being used for diabetes care in US primary care settings, and positive outcomes have been reported. Future research on integration of CCM into primary care settings for diabetes management should measure diabetes process indicators, such as self-efficacy for disease management and clinical decision making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
Power, D. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1593 · Cited by 8,673
Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J., & Bonomi, A. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 · Cited by 3,446
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
Tacconelli, E. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70065-7 · Cited by 3,245
Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness
Bodenheimer, T. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.14.1775 · Cited by 2,961
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2012
(2012) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-s011 · Cited by 2,240
National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Funnell, M. M., Brown, T. L., Childs, B. P., Haas, L. B., Hosey, G. M., Jensen, B., Maryniuk, M., Peyrot, M., Piette, J. D., Reader, D., et al. (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-s087 · Cited by 1,350
Barr, V., Robinson, S., Marin-Link, B., Underhill, L., Dotts, A., Ravensdale, D., & Salivaras, S. (2003) · Healthcare Quarterly · doi:10.12927/hcq.2003.16763 · Cited by 686
A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses.
Tsai, A. C., Morton, S. C., Mangione, C. M., & Keeler, E. B. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 484
Peek, M. E., Cargill, A., & Huang, E. S. (2007) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558707305409 · Cited by 451
A Survey of Leading Chronic Disease Management Programs: Are They Consistent with the Literature?
Wagner, E. H., Davis, C., Schaefer, J., Von Korff, M., & Austin, B. (2002) · Journal of Nursing Care Quality · doi:10.1097/00001786-200201000-00008 · Cited by 376
Cited by
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014
American Diabetes Association (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-s014 · Cited by 4,572
Karlsen, T. H., Sheron, N., Zelber-Sagi, S., Carrieri, P., Dusheiko, G., Bugianesi, E., Pryke, R., Hutchinson, S. J., Sangro, B., Martin, N. K., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01701-3 · Cited by 652
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions
Coulter, A., Entwistle, V. A., Eccles, A., Ryan, S., Shepperd, S., & Perera, R. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010523.pub2 · Cited by 592
Volkow, N. D., & Blanco, C. (2023) · World psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21073 · Cited by 503
Pfaar, O., Demoly, P., Gerth van Wijk, R., Bonini, S., Bousquet, J., Canonica, G. W., Durham, S. R., Jacobsen, L., Malling, H. J., Mösges, R., et al. (2014) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.12383 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Stellefson, M., Dipnarine, K., & Stopka, C.
- Venue
- Preventing Chronic Disease
- Published
- 2013-02-21
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- E26-E26
- ISSN
- 1545-1151 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970443491
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Chronic Care Model and Diabetes Management in US Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5888/pcd10.120180
- The paper
- Stellefson, M., Dipnarine, K., & Stopka, C. (2013). The Chronic Care Model and Diabetes Management in US Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review. Preventing Chronic Disease. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.120180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.