Cited by 118Chronic Disease Management StrategiesHealthcare Policy and ManagementMedical Coding and Health Information

Hospital Utilization, Costs, and Mortality for Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2009

Open access
Steiner, Claudia A., Friedman, Bernard·2013·Preventing Chronic Disease

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to provide a national estimate across all payers of the distribution and cost of selected chronic conditions for hospitalized adults in 2009, stratified by demographic characteristics. ANALYSIS: We analyzed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), the largest all-payer inpatient database in the United States. Use, cost, and mortality estimates across payer, age, sex, and race/ethnicity are produced for grouped or multiple chronic conditions (MCC). The 5 most common dyads and triads were determined. RESULTS: In 2009, there were approximately 28 million adult discharges from US hospitals other than those related to pregnancy and maternity; 39% had 2 to 3 MCC, and 33% had 4 or more. A higher number of MCC was associated with higher mortality, use of services, and average cost. The percentages of Medicaid, privately insured patients, and ethnic/racial groups with 4 or more MCC were highly sensitive to age. SUMMARY: This descriptive analysis of multipayer inpatient data provides a robust national view of the substantial use and costs among adults hospitalized with MCC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5888/pcd10.120292

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polymorbidity affects more than 70% of the hospitalized adult population.

    “Polymorbidity is highly prevalent, affecting more than 70% of the hospitalized adult population, and is associated with higher mortality and healthcare burden [10].”

    From ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Abstract Results report that 39% of adult discharges had 2–3 chronic conditions and 33% had 4 or more—72% combined—but exclude pregnancy- and maternity-related discharges. The Summary says nearly 66% of all adult discharges had two or more chronic conditions. Thus, the claim's unqualified figure of more than 70% for the hospitalized adult population overstates the paper's broader estimate; the paper also measures discharges rather than unique people. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Polymorbidity is associated with higher mortality and healthcare burden.

    “Polymorbidity is highly prevalent, affecting more than 70% of the hospitalized adult population, and is associated with higher mortality and healthcare burden [10].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Friedman B, Jiang J, Elixhauser A, Segal A. Hospital inpatient costs for adults with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev 2006; 63(3): 327– 46. 16651396
  2. [3]Friedman B, Jiang J, Elixhauser A. Costly hospital readmissions and complex chronic illness. Inquiry 2008-2009; 45(4): 408– 21. 19209836
  3. [7]Goodman RA, Posner SF, Huang ES, Parekh AK, Koh HK. Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program and practice. Prev Chronic Dis 2013; 10: 120239. PMC3652713 23618546

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steiner, C. A., & Friedman, B.
Affiliations
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
Corresponding author
Steiner, Claudia A.
Venue
Preventing Chronic Disease
Published
2013-04-25
Volume
10
Pages
E62-E62
ISSN
1545-1151 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983848589
Cited by
118
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Preventing Chronic Disease (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
multimorbidity, hospital utilization, hospital costs, mortality, hospitalized adults, Medicaid, private insurance, racial and ethnic disparities, age differences, National Inpatient Sample
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Social Support, Colorectal Neoplasms, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review