Clinical Identification and Referral of Adults With Prediabetes to a Diabetes Prevention Program
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: Community programs to prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes are effective, but implementing these programs to maximize their reach and impact remains a challenge. The American Medical Association (AMA) partnered with the YMCA of the USA, as part of a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation demonstration project, to develop, implement, and evaluate innovative quality improvement strategies to increase routine screening, testing, and referral of Medicare patients with prediabetes to diabetes prevention programs (DPPs) at local YMCAs. INTERVENTION APPROACH: AMA recruited 26 primary care practices and health systems in 17 US communities to implement point-of-care and retrospective methods (or a combination of both) for screening, testing, and referral of Medicare patients with prediabetes. EVALUATION METHODS: We assessed changes in rates of referral and enrollment of patients among participating practices. We used a mixed-methods pretest-posttest evaluation design to determine if use of certain tools and resources, coupled with systems changes, led to increased screening and referrals. RESULTS: Practices referred a total of 5,640 patients, of whom 1,050 enrolled in a YMCA DPP (19%; range, 2%-98%). Practices (n = 12) that used retrospective (ie, electronic medical record [EMR]) systems to identify eligible Medicare patients via a registry referred more people (n = 4,601) to the YMCA DPP than practices (n = 10) that used a point-of-care method alone (n = 437 patients) or practices (n = 4) that used a combination of these approaches (n = 602 patients). All approaches showed increased enrollment with point-of-care methods being most successful. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Lessons learned from this intervention can be used to increase diabetes prevention in the United States and support the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) decision to expand Medicare coverage to include the DPP for all Medicare beneficiaries.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large study led by the American Medical Association found 56% enrollment upon point-of-care referrals to the NDPP and 11% enrollment using a retrospective, algorithm-based approach to referrals.
“A large study led by the American Medical Association found 56% enrollment upon point-of-care referrals to the NDPP and 11% enrollment using a retrospective, algorithm-based approach to referrals.16”
From <p>Current Perspectives on the Impact of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Building on Successes and Overcoming Challenges</p> (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin
(2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012512 · Cited by 19,011 · see citing works
Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development
Tabák, A. G., Herder, C., Rathmann, W., Brunner, E. J., & Kivimäki, M. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60283-9 · Cited by 2,958 · see citing works
Siu, A. L., & on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-2345 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Ackermann, R. T., Finch, E. A., Caffrey, H. M., Lipscomb, E. R., Hays, L. M., & Saha, C. (2011) · Chronic Illness · doi:10.1177/1742395311407532 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [5]Dall TM, Yang W, Halder P, Pang B, Massoudi M, Wintfeld N, The economic burden of elevated blood glucose levels in 2012: diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus, and prediabetes. Diabetes Care 2014; 37(12): 3172– 9. 10.2337/dc14-1036 25414388 · DOI · Paper page
- [8]Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule and other revisions to Part B for CY 2018; Medicare shared savings program requirements; and Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program. Final Rule. Fed Regist 2017; 82(219): 52976– 3371. 29231695
- [10]Gowin E, Dytfeld J, Michalak M, Horst-Sikorska W. Barriers in the delivery of preventive procedures in primary health care. Fam Med Med Sci Res 2012; 1(1): 101. PMC3460507 23056084
- [11]Balk EM, Earley A, Raman G, Avendano EA, Pittas AG, Remington PL. Combined diet and physical activity promotion programs to prevent type 2 diabetes among persons at increased risk: a systematic review for the Community Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163(6): 437– 51. 10.7326/M15-0452 26167912 PMC4692590 · DOI · Paper page
- [13]Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999; 89(9): 1322– 7. 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322 10474547 PMC1508772 · DOI · Paper page
- [17]Ackermann RT, Finch EA, Brizendine E, Zhou H, Marrero DG. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into the community. The DEPLOY pilot study. Am J Prev Med 2008; 35(4): 357– 63. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.035 18779029 PMC2610485 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ritchie, N. D., Baucom, K. J., & Sauder, K. A. (2020) · Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dmso.s218334 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Alva, M. L., Chakkalakal, R. J., Moin, T., & Galaviz, K. I. (2022) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00259 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Holliday, C. S., Williams, J., Salcedo, V., & Kandula, N. R.
- Affiliations
- American Medical Association (US)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holliday, Christopher S.
- Venue
- Preventing Chronic Disease
- Published
- 2019-06-27
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- E82-E82
- ISSN
- 1545-1151 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6741942
- OpenAlex
- W2952766672
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Preventing Chronic Disease (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092949)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- prediabetes, Diabetes Prevention Program, type 2 diabetes prevention, Medicare beneficiaries, prediabetes screening, point-of-care screening, retrospective screening, primary care practices, quality improvement, YMCA
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Prediabetic State, Preventive Medicine, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, United States, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review