REDEMPTION WITHIN THE GOSPEL NARRATIVES: A THEOLOGICAL AND LITERARY ANALYSIS​

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

The concept of redemption is extensively developed in the Old Testament in the Mosaic Law, but is just briefly mentioned in the New Testament.

“we find that this concept is extensively developed in the Old Testament in the Mosaic Law, but is just briefly mentioned in the New Testament.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

The term hilaskomai is found again only in Hebrews 2.17, where it refers to the propitiation for the sins of the people.

“This term is found again only in Heb.2.17, where it refers to the propitiation for the sins of the people.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The term i`lasth,rion occurs twice in the New Testament (Rom.3.25; Heb.9.5) out of 24 appearances in the LXX and NT.

“the term i`lasth,rion occurs twice in the New Testament (Rom.3.25; Heb.9.5) out of 24 appearances in the LXX and NT.”

• cites Rom.3.25Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Heb.9.5Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The noun i`lasmo,j appears twice in the Epistle of John (1 Jn. 2.2; 4.10) out of 30 uses in the LXX and NT.

“The noun i`lasmo,j appears twice in the Epistle of John (1 Jn. 2.2; 4.10) out of 30 uses in the LXX and NT”

• cites 1 Jn. 2.2Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites 4.10Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

The Old Testament concept of redemption is almost absent in the New Testament.

“The Old Testament concept of redemption is almost absent in the New Testament.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

The verb evxila,skomai is used 106 times, and the noun evxi,lasij appears twice, both only in the OT.

“The verb evxila,skomai is used 106 times, and the noun evxi,lasij appears twice, both only in the OT.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The verbal form i`la,skomai is found twice in the NT (Lk.18.13; Heb.2.17) out of 15 appearances in the LXX and NT.

“form i`la,skomai is found twice in the NT (Lk.18.13; Heb.2.17) out of 15 appearances in the LXX and NT.”

• cites Lk.18.13Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Heb.2.17Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

The concept of redemption is found in the Old Testament, especially in the Pentateuch in Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers.

“The concept of redemption is found in the Old Testament, especially in the Pentateuch in Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

Out of the total occurrence of the concept of redemption in the whole Bible, 98% of its occurrences are found in the Old Testament, while only 2% are found in the New Testament.

“out of its total occurrence in the whole Bible, 98% of its occurrences are found in the Old Testament, while only 2% of its occurrences are found in the”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

The concept of redemption seems sporadic in the Gospels.

“The concept of redemption seems sporadic in the Gospels and because of this there are theologians that see a huge discrepancy between Pauline theology of the atonement, or the model of sacrifice found in Hebrews with the teaching of the Gospels.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The adjective i[lewj is found in Matt.16.22 and Heb.8.12 out of 37 usages in the LXX and NT.

“The adjective i[lewj is found in Matt.16.22 and Heb.8.12 out of 37 usages in the LXX and NT.”

• cites Matt.16.22Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Heb.8.12Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The cognate form avnti,lutron is used once only in the NT (1 Tim.2.6).

“The cognate form avnti,lutron is used once only in the NT (1 Tim.2.6).”

• cites 1 Tim.2.6Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The Day of Atonement had in view the nation as a whole.

“however the Day of Atonement had in view the nation as a whole.”

May combine two claims.

The term lu,tron appears twice in the NT, only in the Gospels (Mt.20.28; Mk. 10.45) out of 22 appearances in the LXX and NT.

“The term lu,tron appears twice in the NT, only in the Gospels (Mt.20.28; Mk. 10.45) out of 22 appearances in the LXX and NT.”

• cites Mt.20.28Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Mk. 10.45Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

The expression 'God, be merciful to me, a sinner!' uses the verb hilaskomai, a verb that has redemptive overtones.

“The expression God, be merciful to me, a sinner!uses the verb i`la,skomai, a verb that has redemptive overtones.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Jesus had prior knowledge of and prophesied his death and resurrection, and the development of this prior knowledge comes to completion in the Gospel of John (10.18).

“Eichhorn admitted that Jesus had to have had prior knowledge of and prophesied his death and resurrection, adding the fact that the development of this prior knowledge comes to its completion in the Gospel of John (10.18).”

• cites EichhornNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The concept of redemption has the notion of paying a necessary price to accomplish the ransom.

“The concept of redemption has the notion of paying a necessary price to accomplish the ransom.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

New Testament writers do not develop the theme of redemption, and the reason behind this aspect is that there is no development needed.

“New Testament writers do not develop the theme of redemption, and the reason behind this aspect is that there is no development needed.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The theology of the atoning sacrifice encapsulates the concept of human sin, the necessity of punishing sin and the cleansing of sin through God's sovereign power.

“Thus, the theology of the atoning sacrifice encapsulates the concept of human sin, the necessity of punishing sin and the cleansing of sin through God's sovereign power.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

The teaching that presents Jesus as a sacrifice for the forgiveness of sin is completed in the Passover event.

“The teaching that presents Jesus as a sacrifice for the forgiveness of sin is completed in the Passover event.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

The sporadic presence of this concept and the lack of an exhaustive discourse on redemption do not affirm the absence of it.

“First, the sporadic presence of this concept and the lack of an exhaustive discourse on redemption do not affirm the absence of it.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

The Old Testament is the foundation of the redemptive sacrifice, while the New Testament is the fulfilment of this atoning sacrifice.

“the Old Testament is the foundation of the redemptive sacrifice, while the New Testament is the fulfilment of this atoning sacrifice.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

It is reasonable to attribute the proper theological emphasis of the Eucharist as a symbol of Jesus' atoning sacrifice.

“Because of this, it is reasonable to attribute the proper theological emphasis of the Eucharist as a symbol of Jesus' atoning sacrifice.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The explicit atoning terminology in the Lord's supper makes an obvious connection to Leviticus 16.

“The explicit atoning terminology (i.e. the giving of life huper humon; the blood that is poured out for forgiveness of sin) makes an obvious connection to Lev. 16.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

The term is clearly rooted in its Old Testament background, and this aspect is vital in order to understand its New Testament Christological features.

“The term is clearly rooted in its Old Testament background, and this aspect is vital in order to understand its New Testament Christological features.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Various remarks about the atoning nature of Jesus' ministry are scattered throughout the Gospels both explicitly and implicitly.

“The various remarks about the atoning nature of this ministry is scattered throughout the Gospels both explicitly and implicitly.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

The Old Testament presents the formation of the concept of redemption, the Evangelists present the Christological fulfilment of it, and the Epistles contain the explanation of this paradigm.

“The Old Testament presents the formation of the concept of redemption, the Evangelists present the Christological fulfilment of it, while the Epistles contain the explanation of this paradigm.”

May combine two claims.

The atonement is possible through blood, not only mere death; the manipulation of the blood that is applied on the horns of the altar and the pouring of the blood before the altar atones for the sin and effects the ransom for the people.

“the atonement is possible through blood, not only mere death; the manipulation of the blood that is applied on the horns of the altar and the pouring of the blood before the altar atones for the sin and effects the ransom for the people (c.f.Lev.16.18-19, 17.11).20”

• cites [20]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Lev.16.18-19Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites 17.11Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The Lukan version of the Eucharistic saying has a deep theological insight through the use of the expression huper humon as a reference to both the body and the blood of Jesus.

“The Lukan version of the Eucharistic saying has a deep theological insight through the use of the expression u`pe.ru`mw/n as a reference to both the body and the blood of Jesus.”

May combine two claims.

Christ becomes not only the perfect High Priest but also the sacrifice itself.

“Christ becomes not only the perfect High Priest but also the sacrifice itself (i.e.Titus 2.14).”

• cites Titus 2.14Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

The model of sacrifice is by far the most satisfactory biblical model for what was effected by the life and death of Christ.

“as Richard Swinburne argued, the model of sacrifice is by far the most satisfactory biblical model for what was effected by the life and death of Christ.”

• cites Richard SwinburneNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

The sacrifice becomes only a postponed payment, while the actual payment was made fully in Christ.

“The sacrifice becomes thus only a postponed payment, while the actual payment was made fully in Christ.”

May combine two claims.

The atonement is substitutive; thus, death is seen as a necessity in accomplishing this act.

“The atonement is substitutive; thus, death is seen as a necessity in accomplishing this act.19”

• cites [19]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The Sacrifice of the first goat symbolised the fact that sin requires a death penalty, while the sending of the second goat for Azazel, after the laying of hands on it and confession of sin, symbolised the removal of sin.

“The Sacrifice of the first goat symbolised the fact that sin requires a death penalty, while the sending of the second goat for Azazel, after the laying of hands on it and confession of sin, symbolised the removal of sin.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

The death of Jesus Christ ought not to be construed merely in terms analogous to the deaths of other Jewish martyrs; rather, it possesses substitutionary characteristics par excellence.

“The death of Jesus Christ ought not to be construed merely in terms analogous to the deaths of other Jewish martyrs, who sacrificed their lives for their convictions and for the Jewish nation.Rather, the death of Jesus possesses substitutionary characteristics par excellence.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The author of the book of Hebrews highlights the fact that it was impossible for the blood of animals to take away sins.

“The author of the book of Hebrews highlights the fact that it was impossible for the blood of animals to take away”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

In John's Epistle, the concept of redemption is rooted in God's character of love, not vice versa.

“In John's Epistle, the concept of redemption is rooted in God's character of love, not vice versa.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The burnt offering symbolised God's total power of destroying sin.

“The burnt offering symbolised God's total power of destroying sin.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Through redemption, the relationship between God and man is reestablished.

“Through redemption, the relationship between God and man is reestablished (e.g.Leviticus 16-17).”

• cites Leviticus 16-17Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

The theological foundation for redemption is found in the Old Testament, while the fulfilment of this reality is found in the life and teaching of Jesus as presented in the Gospels.

“The theological foundation for the redemption is to be found in the Old Testament, while the fulfilment of this reality is found in the life and teaching of Jesus as presented in the Gospels.”

May combine two claims.

The allusions to Jesus as an atoning figure in Acts are not few, and Acts 20.28 is a clear and emphatic teaching of Jesus.

“In reality, the allusions to Jesus as an atoning figure are not few (3.13, 26; 4.27, 30; 5.30; 8.30-35; 10.39; 13.29), and the affirmation of 20.28 is a clear and emphatic teaching of Jesus.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The Shepherd passage, John 10, presents Christ as the Good Shepherd who gives His life for the sheep.

“The Shepherd passage, John 10 presents Christ as the Good Shepherd who gives His life for the sheep.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

There is a clear connection between the Lord's supper and the Servant passage of Isaiah 53, where the redemptive theme is prophetically expanded.

“Moreover, there is a clear connection with the Servant passage of Isaiah 53 as well, where the redemptive theme is prophetically expanded.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

The sporadic usage of the terms does not necessarily suggest that the theological concept is in any way insignificant.

“the sporadic usage of the terms, however, does not necessarily suggest that the theological concept is in any way insignificant.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

Mark 10:45 provides a perfect summary of the servant's vicarious death on behalf of many others.

“Mark 10:45 provides a perfect summary of the servant's vicarious death on behalf of many others.”

• cites Peter G. BoltNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

It is inconceivable that something as central as the eucharist should have been invented and placed upon the lips of Jesus by the catechesis of the early Church.

“it is inconceivable that something as central as the eucharist (and all that went with it) should have been invented and placed upon the lips of Jesus by the catechesis of the early Church.”

• cites WinterNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

The doctrine of vicarious atonement is vital for the most important biblical doctrines, as it is the point of convergence of Christology, Soteriology, Anthropology, Hamartiology, and Doxology.

“Nevertheless, the doctrine of vicarious atonement is vital for the most important biblical doctrines, as it is the point of convergence of Christology, Soteriology, Anthropology, Hamartiology, and Doxology.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The death of Jesus is presented in the Gospels as an intentional event with soteriological and substitutive connotations par excellence.

“The death of Jesus is presented in the Gospels as an intentional event with soteriological and substitutive connotations par excellence”

May combine two claims.

Matthew 20.28 and Mark 10.45 are the clearest passages containing the most explicit saying on redemption, in which Matthew and Mark use lutron to emphasize the ransom that the Son of Man provides for many.

“Mt.20.28 and Mk10.45 are the clearest passages that contain this most explicit saying on redemption in which Matthew and Mark use the term lu,tron to emphasize the ransom that the Son of Man provides for many.”

May combine two claims.

God's love not only precedes redemption but also determines it.

“God's love not only precedes redemption but also determines it (1 John 4.10).”

• cites 1 John 4.10Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The prayer of the tax collector in Luke 18.9-14 alludes to the necessity of redemptive mercy.

“The prayer of the tax collector alludes to the necessity of redemptive mercy.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Christ's righteousness is vitally different to the righteousness of the Old Testament high priest.

“Christ's righteousness is vitally different to the righteousness of the Old Testament high priest.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

To argue that the concept of redemption is not vital in the theology of the Gospels based on the insignificant usage of cognate words is to use an argumentum ad dictionarium fallacy.

“To argue that the concept of redemption is not vital in the theology of the Gospels based on the insignificant usage of cognate words is to use an argumentum ad dictionarium fallacy in which the use of a certain terminology is the ultimate evidence for the existence or non-existence of that concept.”

May combine two claims.

The expression huper humon probably alludes to Isaiah 53.12, indicating that Christ gave his body on the believers' behalf and/or in the believers' place.

“as Witherington noted, it probably alludes to Isaiah 53.12, indicating that Christ gave his body on the believers' behalf and/or in the believers' place.”

• cites WitheringtonNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

The basis of this Christological construct is in the Old Testament, while the New Testament represents the completion of this ministry with explicit and implicit Christological features.

“The basis of this Christological construct is in the Old Testament, while the New Testament represents the completion of this ministry with explicit and implicit Christological features.”

May combine two claims.

Redemption has its fundament in the OT and its fulfilment in the NT.

“Thus, redemption has its fundament in the OT and its fulfilment in the NT.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The terms redemption, purification, forgiveness, and sanctification describe the same reality of sacrifice through blood.

“suggests that the terms redemption, purification, forgiveness, and sanctification describe the same reality of sacrifice through blood.13”

• cites [13]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

God has initiated an action that is rightfully called substitutive, putting His Son in our place, being simultaneously just and merciful.

“God has initiated an action that is rightfully called substitutive, putting His Son in our place, being simultaneously just and merciful.26”

• cites [26]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

While the New Testament may not develop a theology of redemption, it contains the fundamental principles through which the redemption is performed.

“While the New Testament may not develop a theology of redemption, it contains the fundamental principles through which the redemption is performed.21”

• cites [21]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The reason for this redemption is found in God's own character.

“The reason for this redemption is found in God's own character.17”

• cites [17]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

John never works out a theory of atonement similar to all the other New Testament writers, but the main theological theme in the Gospel encapsulates an atoning theology.

“Morris admits that John never works out a theory of atonement, similar to all the other New Testament writers; however, the main theological theme in the Gospel (e.g.sin, judgment, the death of Jesus, life eternal, Christ as our substitute) encapsulates an atoning theology.”

• cites MorrisNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

Redemption is fundamental to the Jewish religious system.

“Redemption is fundamental to the Jewish religious system.”

May combine two claims.

The author of Hebrews emphasizes that the blood of the animals could not solve the problem of sin, thus the Day of Atonement in essence did not solve the sin issue.

“However, the author of Hebrew emphasizes that the blood of the animals could not solve the problem of sin, thus the Day of Atonement in essence did not solve the sin issue.”

May combine two claims.

Leviticus 17.11 affirms that the life of the flesh is in the blood; therefore, the sacrifice is possible through this substitutive blood, since the blood of the sacrifice substitutes the life of the sinner.

“Leviticus 17.11 affirms the fact that the life of the flesh is in the blood; therefore, the sacrifice is possible through this substitutive blood, since the blood of the sacrifice substitutes the life of the sinner.”

• cites Leviticus 17.11Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

This righteousness of God in Christ is the basis on which the redemption is performed.

“This righteousness of God in Christ is the basis on which the redemption is performed.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The concept of atonement in John's Gospel is a central theological emphasis.

“Leon Morris, on the other hand, argues convincingly that the concept of atonement in John's Gospel is a central theological emphasis.”

• cites MorrisNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

The concept of redemption includes everything that Christ has realised for us.

“The concept of redemption includes everything that Christ has realised for us.”

May combine two claims.

Although the terminology for redemption is scarcely present in the Gospels, the concept is not nowhere present or peripheral.

“While it is evident that the terminology for redemption is scarcely present in the Gospels, this does not mean that the concept is nowhere present or that it is peripheral.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

In Matthew 20.28 and Mark 10.45, Christ told his disciples that the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.

“In Matthew 20.28, Mark 10.45, Christ has told his disciples that the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”

• cites Matthew 20.28Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Mark 10.45Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The Gospel narratives are reliable accounts of Jesus' life and teachings.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Christ's superiority and distinctiveness are seen in the fact that he, as the High Priest par excellence, is without sin, hence he does not need a sacrifice for his own sins.

“Christ's superiority and distinctiveness are seen in the fact that he, as the High Priest par excellence, is without sin, hence he does not need a sacrifice for his own sins.”

May combine two claims.

Hebrews 10.4 attests that it was impossible for the blood of animals to take away sins; thus, redemption was accomplished in the Old Testament only de jure, while de facto it was accomplished through Christ's propitiation for sin.

“Hebrews 10.4 attests the fact that it was impossible for the blood of animals to take away sins; thus, it is clear that redemption was accomplished in the Old Testament only de jure, while de facto it was accomplished through Christ's propitiation for sin (e.g. 1 John 4.10).”

• cites Hebrews 10.4Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites 1 John 4.10Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

The problem with Dunn's interpretation of Lukan kerygma that lacks a theology of the cross is the downplay not only of the allusions to the ransom theme, but even to the explicit kerygma that marks the genesis of the Church (Acts 2.36).

“The problem with Dunn's interpretation of Lukan kerygma that lacks a theology of the cross is the downplay not only of the allusions to the ransom theme, but even to the explicit kerygma that marks the genesis of the Church (i.e.Acts.2.36)”

• cites DunnNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The authors of the Hebrew OT and the LXX translators are far removed from the crude pagan idea of propitiating a capricious and malevolent deity.

“Link and Brown correctly argued that the authors of the Hebrew OT and the LXX translators are far removed from the crude pagan idea of propitiating a capricious and malevolent deity.”

• cites Link and BrownNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

Christ's superiority in accomplishing the redemptive ministry is seen in the fact that while the high priests had to atone for sins every year, Christ's redemption is a unique event, performed once and for all.

“Christ's superiority in accomplishing the redemptive ministry is seen in the sheer fact that while the high priests had to atone for sins every year, Christ's redemption is a unique event, performed once and for all (Heb.10.19-22).”

• cites Heb.10.19-22Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The Day of Atonement was the most important in the Mosaic system, because on that day the removal of sin was given its highest expression.

“The Day of Atonement was the most important in the Mosaic system, because on that day the removal of sin was given its highest expression.”

• cites [29]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

The absence of evidence is not the same as the evidence of absence; the absence of terminology is not an argument for the absence of the theme.

“The absence of evidence is not the same as the evidence of absence.Similarly, the absence of the terminology is not an argument for the absence of the theme.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

The sinfulness of man implies a spiritual death that can be resolved only through a substitutionary atonement, the only way in which reconciliation with God is possible.

“The sinfulness of man implies a spiritual death that can be resolved only through a substitutionary atonement, the only way in which reconciliation with God is possible.2”

• cites [2]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

The concept of redemption is explicitly present in the Old Testament and is elaborated extensively in Paul's Epistles, the Epistle to the Hebrews, and the First Epistle of John.

“This concept of redemption is explicitly present in the Old Testament and is elaborated upon extensively in Paul's Epistles, the Epistle to the Hebrews, and the First Epistle of John.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The Old and New Testament writings form a single coherent theological canon whose concepts can be compared and harmonized.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

In Romans 3.21, Paul begins an important section in which he shows the way the death of Christ has to do with the problem of sin.

“In Romans 3.21, Paul begins an important section in which he shows the way the death of Christ has to do with the problem of sin.27”

• cites [27]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The redemption was vital for Israel since God's holiness required purity.

“The redemption was vital for Israel since God's holiness required purity.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The access that Christ had in view was access into the presence of God in heaven.

“Leon Morris correctly mentioned that the access that Christ had in view was access into the presence of God in heaven.30”

• cites [30]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

True redemption from sin was performed by Christ through his sacrifice.

“True redemption from sin was performed by Christ through his sacrifice.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

The theology of redemption in the Gospel narratives is completely synchronized with this teaching found elsewhere in the New Testament.

“this study seeks to emphasize not only the presence of the theology of redemption in the Gospel narratives, but also the fact that this theology is completely synchronized with this teaching found elsewhere in the New Testament.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The Gospel narratives are reliable accounts of Jesus' life and teachings.
• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The Old and New Testament writings form a single coherent theological canon whose concepts can be compared and harmonized.