The DOI matches its Crossref record.
African Journal of Agricultural Research
Open accessAbstract
Fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum F. sp. phaseoli caused growers to abandon the most popular climbing bean cultivar, Umubano (G2333) in Rwanda. The present objective was to determine the nature of inheritance of fusarium wilt resistance and recommend a breeding strategy to introduce resistance into susceptible cultivars. Two cultivars, vuninkingi (G685) and flora were donors of resistance to fusarium wilt whereas G2333 was highly susceptible. Injured root tips of 10-day old seedlings of the parents, progenies of F1 and F2 (G2333 × G685) and (G2333 × Flora), backcrosses F2 (G685 × Flora) were inoculated with 106 conidia ml-1 of Rwandan isolate of F. oxysporum F. sp phaseoli (FOP-RW2) in a glasshouse. The disease severity was rated 28 days later using the CIAT scale of 1 - 9, where 1 - 3 represent resistant, 4 - 6 tolerant and 7 - 9 susceptible reactions. The chi-square analysis was performed to determine the Mendelian segregation ratios of resistant and susceptibility among the inoculated progenies. The F1 and the backcross progenies to the resistant parents segregated in the ratio of 1:0 as did the F2 population (G685 × Flora). The F2 progenies segregated in the ratio of 3:1. The backcross progenies to the susceptible parent segregated in the ratio of 1:1. Resistance to fusarium wilt is conditioned by a single highly heritable major dominant gene. The resistance can be achieved by backcross breeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Flavonoids: A Review
Routray, W., & Orsat, V. (2012) · Food and Bioprocess Technology · doi:10.1007/s11947-011-0573-z · Cited by 676
Dietz, K. ‐., Zörb, C., & Geilfus, C. ‐. (2021) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/plb.13304 · Cited by 452
Cocoa production in West Africa, a review and analysis of recent developments
Wessel, M., & Quist-Wessel, P. M. F. (2015) · NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2015.09.001 · Cited by 375
Giller, K. E., Delaune, T., Silva, J. V., van Wijk, M., Hammond, J., Descheemaeker, K., van de Ven, G., Schut, A. G. T., Taulya, G., Chikowo, R., et al. (2021) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-021-01209-0 · Cited by 329
Sustainable harvesting of wild seaweed resources.
Mac Monagail, M., Cornish, L., Morrison, L., Araújo, R., & Critchley, A. T. (2017) · European Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1080/09670262.2017.1365273 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Venue
- African Journal of Agricultural Research
- Publisher
- Academic Journals
- Published
- 2026-10-09
- ISSN
- 1991-637X (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.5897/ajar
- OpenAlex
- W2130600976
- Cited by
- 4,068
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: African Journal of Agricultural Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5897/ajar
- The paper
- African Journal of Agricultural Research. (2026). African Journal of Agricultural Research. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.