The DOI matches its Crossref record.
African Journal of Biotechnology
Open accessAbstract
A study was undertaken to assess the prevalence, mean intensity, abundance and seasonality of parasites of fish in a natural, freshwater, tropical lake, southeast Nigeria. A total of 1191 fish specimen belonging to four families (Cichlidae, Bagridae, Hepsetidae and Channidae), seven genera and nine species were collected from the lake and examined for parasites. Eleven (11) species of parasites comprising metacercariae of three digenetic trematodes, one cestode, five nematodes and two acanthocephalans were isolated. Clinostomoides sp. showed the highest range of sites of infection, and the operculum carried significantly more worm burden (F = 196.843, d.f. = 5, p = 0.000) than other sites infected by this parasite. Prevalence ranged from 0.7 % in Clinostomum tilapiae infection of T. zillii to 71.7 % in Neochinorhynchus sp.2 infection of Hepsetidae fasciatus with an overall prevalence of 59.5%. Mean intensity ranged from 1.0 ± 0.0 in Clinostomoides sp. and Proteocephalus sp. infection of P. obscura and Anemone occidentalis, respectively, to 76.5 ± 29.7 in Neoechinorhynchus sp. 2 infection of H. fasciatus. Neoechinorhynchus sp. 2 infection also had the highest mean abundance (54.90 ± 2.74) while the lowest was recorded in the Clinostomoides sp. infection of H. fasciatus. Patterns of infection were significantly different in the prevalence and abundance of Clinostomoides sp; Camallanus sp.3 and Neoechinorhynchus sp.1 while mean intensity was comparable in all cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conversion of organic material by black soldier fly larvae: establishing optimal feeding rates
Diener, S., Zurbrügg, C., & Tockner, K. (2009) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x09103838 · Cited by 820
Biodegradation of Synthetic Dyes—A Review
Ali, H. (2010) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-010-0382-4 · Cited by 817
Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Metabolism under Adverse Environmental Conditions: a Review
García-Caparrós, P., De Filippis, L., Gul, A., Hasanuzzaman, M., Ozturk, M., Altay, V., & Lao, M. T. (2021) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/s12229-020-09231-1 · Cited by 555
Rao, C. R. M., Sahuquillo, A., & Lopez Sanchez, J. F. (2008) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9564-0 · Cited by 538
Sustainable biofuels from algae
Borowitzka, M. A., & Moheimani, N. R. (2013) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-010-9271-9 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Venue
- AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Publisher
- Academic Journals
- Published
- 2026-10-09
- ISSN
- 1684-5315 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.5897/ajb
- OpenAlex
- W2908631100
- Cited by
- 4,539
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: African Journal of Biotechnology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5897/ajb
- The paper
- African Journal of Biotechnology. (2026). AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.