The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heavy metals accumulation and distribution pattern in different vegetable crops
Abstract
Different vegetable crops grown on heavy metal contaminated soil showed marked difference in metal accumulation, their uptake and distribution pattern. Crop species also showed remarkable difference in metal concentration of various plant parts. Based on metal accumulation in edible parts and whole plants, root vegetables namely, radish and carrot registered lower accumulation of almost all heavy metals except Zn in radish root. However, leafy vegetables namely, spinach, amaranthus, mustard and fenugreek recorded higher accumulation of both essential and non-essential heavy metals, except Cd and Ni which showed less accumulation in fenugreek. Potato and onion showed lower accumulation of Zn and Cu and higher accumulation of Cd and Ni. Cauliflower and cabbage, however, showed greater accumulation of Pb and Ni, but less accumulation of Cu and Cd. Among fruit type vegetables, pea, soybean and cluster bean showed greater accumulation of Pb and Ni and very less accumulation of Cd. Among different vegetables cauliflower and cabbage recorded highest uptake of Zn, Pb and Ni, while mustard showed higher uptake of Zn and Cd. In general the uptake of Cd was lowest in almost all the crops except mustard. Generally the root and leafy vegetables namely. radish, carrot, spinach, amaranthus, mustard, cauliflower and cabbage showed higher distribution of metals to the edible parts, whereas fruit types vegetables specially tomato and brinjal exhibited least transport of metals to fruits except…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although Singh et al. (2012) revealed no specific absorption mechanism for Cr, it is possible that the decreased accumulation of Cr, Ni, and Pb in crops' edible sections is attributable to their toxicity.
“Although Singh et al. (2012) revealed no specific absorption mechanism for Cr, it is possible that the decreased accumulation of Cr, Ni, and Pb in crops' edible sections is attributable to their toxicity”
From Assessment of heavy metals accumulation by vegetables irrigated with different stages of textile wastewater for evaluation of food and health risk (2024) · cites this paper as Singh et al. (2012)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review with recent advancements on bioremediation-based abolition of heavy metals
Gaur, N., Flora, G., Yadav, M., & Tiwari, A. (2014) · Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts · doi:10.1039/c3em00491k · Cited by 273
Hassan, J., Rajib, M. M. R., Khan, M. N.-E.-A., Khandaker, S., Zubayer, M., Ashab, K. R., Kuba, T., Marwani, H. M., Asiri, A. M., Hasan, M. M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120206 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- S. Singh
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology
- Publisher
- Academic Journals
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 2141-226X
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review