Some Year Dates of Horemheb in Context
Abstract
This article reconsiders the content and context of a well-known, but heretofore poorly understood, text from Horemheb's “Mansion of Millions of Years” by Medinet Habu. The hieratic ink inscription, dated to year twenty-seven of an unnamed king, has often been dismissed as a “graffito” of the Ramesside period. In fact, however, it may be a work notation related to the movement of statuary within the temple, in which case we should at least consider the possibility that it dates to the reign of Horemheb rather than to a later period. The article also discusses the wine jar dockets recovered during the re-clearance of KV 57 and their possible significance to the chronology of the reign.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ahhiyawa, Hatti, and Diplomacy: Implications of Hittite Misperceptions of the Mycenaean World
Blackwell, N. G. (2022) · Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens · doi:10.2972/hesperia.90.2.0191
“Bryson (2015), however, maintained the possibility of a longer reign based on a statue fragment with a graffito that mentioned the 27th year of an unnamed king.”
- Authors
- Bryson, K. M.
- Corresponding author
- Bryson, Karen Margaret
- Venue
- Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt
- Publisher
- Lockwood Press
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 285-301
- ISSN
- 0065-9991 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-1880
- OpenAlex
- W2410274458
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- Horemheb, Medinet Habu, Ramesside period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review