Cited by 1Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

Some Year Dates of Horemheb in Context

Bryson, Karen Margaret·2015·Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt

Abstract

This article reconsiders the content and context of a well-known, but heretofore poorly understood, text from Horemheb's “Mansion of Millions of Years” by Medinet Habu. The hieratic ink inscription, dated to year twenty-seven of an unnamed king, has often been dismissed as a “graffito” of the Ramesside period. In fact, however, it may be a work notation related to the movement of statuary within the temple, in which case we should at least consider the possibility that it dates to the reign of Horemheb rather than to a later period. The article also discusses the wine jar dockets recovered during the re-clearance of KV 57 and their possible significance to the chronology of the reign.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5913/jarce.51.2015.a016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryson, K. M.
Corresponding author
Bryson, Karen Margaret
Venue
Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt
Published
2015-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
285-301
ISSN
  • 0065-9991 (ISSN-L)
  • 2330-1880
OpenAlex
W2410274458
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
Horemheb, Medinet Habu, Ramesside period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review