The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Journal Series on Governance and Management of IT in Electronic-Based Government Systems (SPBE) in Indonesia
Open accessAbstract
SPBE Governance and Management is a framework that guarantees the implementation of regulation, direction and control in the implementation of SPBE in an integrated manner. SPBE Governance and Management aims to ensure that SPBE elements consist of the National SPBE Master Plan, SPBE Architecture, SPBE Roadmap, SPBE Program Plan and Budget, Business Process, Data and Information, SPBE Infrastructure, SPBE Application, SPBE Security, and Services SPBE. to achieve SPBE goals. In implementing all SPBE elements, integration and harmonization between the National SPBE and Regional SPBE are required. Therefore, this thesis research raises SPBE Governance and Management in accordance with COBIT 2019 as a governance framework that is set globally. Thus, this research will provide recommendations for the implementation of SPBE in Indonesia which can provide appropriate benefits for SPBE users, namely the community, business actors, civil servants, and other government agencies, and have detailed objectives and activities in accordance with COBIT 2019.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) framework promotes an integrated electronic government system by reducing redundancies and enhancing public service delivery.
“the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) framework promotes an integrated electronic government system by reducing redundancies and enhancing public service delivery through interoperable systems and collaborative governance practices (Asianto et al., 2023).”
From Smart city governance and interoperability: enhancing human security in Yogyakarta and Makassar, Indonesia (2025) · cites this paper as Asianto et al., 2023
The Abstract says SPBE governance is intended to implement SPBE in an integrated manner and requires harmonization between national and regional SPBE. The Introduction links integrated IT-based processes with added value for public services. Our copy does not say that SPBE reduces redundancies or that interoperable systems and collaborative governance practices are the means by which it improves service delivery. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Science and Engineering 2022, MIMSE 2022 (Informatics and Computer Science)(MIMSE- IC-2022), 22-34. Atlantis Press.
- El Ghorfi, Rabii, El Aroussi, Mohamed, Ouadou, Mohamed, & Aboutajdine, Driss. (2018). Valuating IT governance strategies with real options in a decision making framework. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), 10(4), 42-58.
- Fernandes, Andry Johanes, Hartono, Hartono, & Aziza, Chakir. (2020). Assessment IT governance of human resources information system using COBIT 5. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 8(4), 59-63.
- Ghildyal, Amit, & Chang, Elizabeth. (2017). IT governance, IT/business alignment and organization performance for public sectors. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 5(6), 255-260.
- Indriasari, Elisa, Supangkat, Suhono Harso, & Kosala, Raymond. (2020). Digital transformation: it governance in the agile environment a study case of Indonesia high regulated company. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 1557-1562.
- Katili, M. R., Pateda, V., Djafri, M. G., & Amali, L. N. (2019). Measuring the capability level of IT governance: a research study of COBIT 5 at Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387(1), 12021. IOP Publishing.
- Kude, Thomas, Lazic, Miroslav, Heinzl, Armin, & Neff, Alexander. (2018). Achieving IT-based synergies through regulation-oriented and consensus-oriented IT governance capabilities. Information Systems Journal, 28(5), 765-795.
- Masuda, Yoshimasa, Zimmermann, Alfred, Viswanathan, Murlikrishna, Bass, Matt, Nakamura, Osamu, & Yamamoto, Shuichiro. (2021). Adaptive enterprise architecture for the digital healthcare industry: A digital platform for drug development. Information, 12(2), 67.
- Moeller, Robert R. (2013). Executive's guide to IT governance: improving systems processes with service management, COBIT, and ITIL (Vol. 637). John Wiley & Sons.
- Moore, Mark H. (2012). Recognizing public value. Harvard University Press.
- Nugroho, Antonius Sony Eko, Tjhin, Viany Utami, Kosasih, Wibowo, & Prabowo, Harjanto. (2022). BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH TREND ON AGILE IT GOVERNANCE. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 6(1), 65- 79.
- Rozas, Indri Sudanawati, Khalid, Khalid, Yalina, Nita, Wahyudi, Noor, & Rolliawati, Dwi. (2020). Digital Enterprise Architecture for Green SPBE in Indonesia. CCIT (Creative Communication and Innovative Technology) Journal, 15(1), 24-26.
- Sholihat, Nur Imroatun. (2018). The Implementation of COBIT 4.1 and COBIT 5-Based IT Governance Audits in the Ministry of Finance of Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 21(2).
- Sipayung, Anugrahi Bawani, & Yunis, Roni. (2022). Evaluation Of Information Technology Governance at Mikroskil University Using COBIT 2019 Framework with BAI11 Domain. International Journal of Research and Applied Technology (INJURATECH), 2(2), 128-143. e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
- Siregar, Sylvia Veronica, & Harahap, Siti Nurwahyuningsih. (2023). The effect of business uncertainty on IT governance. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(2), 420- 433.
- Sutejo, Bayu Sulistiyanto Ipung, & Firmansyah, Gerry. (2022). Evaluation of SPBE Management Domain of Tangerang City Government Based on Regulation of the Minister of PAN-RB Number 59 of 2020. First Mandalika International Multi-Conference on Science and Engineering 2022, MIMSE 2022 (Informatics and Computer Science)(MIMSE-IC-2022), 105-116. Atlantis Press.
- Syuhada, Aldy Maulana. (2021). Kajian Perbandingan Cobit 5 dengan Cobit 2019 sebagai Framework Audit Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(1), 30-39.
- Turel, Ofir, Liu, Peng, & Bart, Chris. (2019). Is board IT governance a silver bullet? A capability complementarity and shaping view. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 33, 32-46.
- Zhen, Jie, Xie, Zongxiao, & Dong, Kunxiang. (2021). Impact of IT governance mechanisms on organizational agility and the role of top management support and IT ambidexterity. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 40, 100501.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hardi, R., Nurmandi, A., Purwaningsih, T., & Manaf, H. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2025.1553177 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Asianto, A., Fatonah, N. S., Firmansyah, G., & Akbar, H.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Esa Unggul (ID)
- Venue
- Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
- Publisher
- Publikasi Indonesia
- Published
- 2023-09-25
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 802-814
- ISSN
- 2723-6595 (ISSN-L)
- 2723-6692
- OpenAlex
- W4387104308
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Harvard University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
- Keywords
- e-government, IT governance, information technology management, COBIT 2019, government information systems, e-government architecture, e-government security, Indonesia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
