Percepción de la calidad de vida y satisfacción en pacientes portadores de dentaduras parcial removible
Open accessAbstract
Introducción: Diversos autores mencionan que una correcta planificación de una dentadura parcial removible puede ofrecer incrementa la satisfacción de los pacientes, en cuanto a estética y función. En casos donde la estética es prioritaria, se plantea un diseño sin retenedores visibles. En estos casos, la elaboración de la dentadura no demanda mayores costos, basta con establecer el diagnóstico correspondiente valorando los pilares, eje de inserción, áreas retentivas entre otros y establecer el diseño más conveniente según sea el caso. Objetivo: El objetivo fue realizar una revisión sistematizada sobre la percepción de la calidad de vida y satisfacción en pacientes portadores de dentaduras parciales removibles. Materiales y métodos: Se incluyeron 13 artículos científicos mediante la metodología PRISMA para la identificación, revisión e inclusión de los textos que formaron parte del estudio. Se seleccionaron tomando en cuenta el título, resumen y objetivo. Fueron considerados: revisiones sistemáticas, metaanálisis, estudios comparativos y revisiones de literatura que evaluaran diferentes criterios acerca de la satisfacción en pacientes portadores de dentadura parcial removible. Los artículos fueron leídos íntegramente, se analizaron objetivos, metodología y conclusión de cada uno de ellos, y posteriormente fueron analizados. Resultados: La queja más común fue el resultado estético, seguida del dolor durante la masticación. Se recomienda ofrecer un control periódico de la prótesis parcial removible para evaluar el correcto funcionamiento y ajuste de esta. Conclusión: El éxito del tratamiento con dentaduras parciales removibles se puede optimizar mediante el diagnóstico preciso del caso, considerando experiencias previas del paciente y teniendo en cuenta sus expectativas. Asimismo, comprender ciertos factores como su estilo de vida, nivel socioeconómico, estado de salud periodontal, personalidad, puede disminuir el riesgo de fracaso futuro del tratamiento con dentaduras parciales removibles.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conventional approaches typically involve multiple staged bone augmentation procedures or removable prostheses to restore adequate bone volume and occlusal support.
“Conventional approaches typically involve multiple staged bone augmentation procedures or removable prostheses to restore adequate bone volume and occlusal support [6].”
From Implant-supported fixed prosthodontic treatment for ectodermal dysplasia: a case report (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
The Introduction and p. 44 describe removable partial dentures as a treatment option for missing teeth and say they can provide adequate function. The paper does not describe multiple staged bone-augmentation procedures or say removable prostheses restore bone volume; it also does not establish the claimed restoration of occlusal support. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Aljabri, M. K., Ibrahim, T. O., & Sharka, R. M. (2017). Removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction and complaints in Makkah City, KSA. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 12(6), 561-564. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.03.002 · DOI
- Al-Omiri, M. K., Sghaireen, M. G., Al-Qudah, A. A., Hammad, O. A., Lynch, C. D., & Lynch, E. (2014). Relationship between impacts of removable prosthodontic rehabilitation on daily living, satisfaction and personality profiles. Journal of Dentistry, 42(3), 366-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.010 · DOI
- Campbell, S. D., Cooper, L., Craddock, H., Hyde, T. P., Nattress, B., Pavitt, S. H., & Seymour, D. W. (2017). Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 118(3), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008 · DOI
- Čelebić, A., & Knezović-Zlatarić, D. (2003). A comparison of patient's satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. Journal of Dentistry, 31(7), 445-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300- 5712(03)00094-0 · DOI
- Fenlon, M. R., & Sherriff, M. (2008). An investigation of factors influencing patients' satisfaction with new complete dentures using structural equation modelling. Journal of Dentistry, 36(6), 427-434. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.016 · DOI
- Frank, R. P., Milgrom, P., Leroux, B. G., & Hawkins, N. R. (1998). Treatment outcomes with mandibular removable partial dentures: A population-based study of patient satisfaction. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 80(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70089-7 · DOI
- Jacobson, T. E. (1982). Satisfying Esthetic Demands with Rotational Path Partial Dentures. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 105(3), 460-465. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1982.0346 · DOI
- Knezović, D., Čelebić, A., Valentić-Peruzović, M., Jerolimov, V., & Pandurić, J. (2003). A survey of treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 30(8), 847-854. https://doi. org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01039.x · DOI
- Krausch-Hofmann, S., Cuypers, L., Ivanova, A., & Duyck, J. (2016). Predictors of Patient Satisfaction with Removable Denture Renewal: A Pilot Study. Journal of Prosthodontics, 27(6), 509-516. https://doi. org/10.1111/jopr.12537 · DOI
- Shala, K. S., Dula, L. J., Pustina-Krasniqi, T., Bicaj, T., Ahmedi, E. F., Lila-Krasniqi, Z., & Tmava-Dragusha, A. (2016). Patient's Satisfaction with Removable Partial Dentures: A Retrospective Case Series. The Open Dentistry Journal, 10(1), 656-663. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010656 · DOI
- Siqueira, G. P. D., dos Santos, M. B. F., Santos, J. F. F. D., & Marchini, L. (2012). Patients' expectation and satisfaction with removable dental prosthesis therapy and correlation with patients' evaluation of the dentists. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 71(1), 210-214. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.654612 · DOI
- Suh, J. S., & Billy, E. J. (2008). Rotational Path Removable Partial Denture (RPD): Conservative Esthetic Treatment Option for the Edentulous Mandibular Anterior Region: A Case Report. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 20(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00158.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implant-supported fixed prosthodontic treatment for ectodermal dysplasia: a case report
Wang, Y., Chen, S., & Zhou, Y. (2026) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-08326-2
- Authors
- Rios López, A. I., & Alcántara Chávez, D.
- Venue
- Odontología Vital
- Publisher
- Universidad Latina de Costa Rica
- Published
- 2024-01-31
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 40
- ISSN
- 1659-0775 (ISSN-L)
- 2215-5740
- OpenAlex
- W4391644646
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Odontología Vital (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Keywords
- removable partial dentures, quality of life, patient satisfaction, masticatory pain, prosthodontic diagnosis, treatment expectations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
