Cited by 27Skin Protection and AgingPhotochromic and Fluorescence ChemistryPhotopolymerization techniques and applications

SYNTHESIS AND EVALUATION OF OCTOCRYLENE-INSPIRED COMPOUNDS FOR UV-FILTER ACTIVITY

Open access
Polonini, Hudson C., Lopes, Rosângela S., Beatriz, Adilson, Gomes, Roberto S., Silva, Adriano O., Lima, Ricardo V. de, Nunes, Gláucia. A., Brandão, Marcos Antônio F. +2 more·2014·Química Nova

Abstract

Octocrylene (2-ethylhexyl 2-cyano-3,3-diphenyl-2-propenoate) is present in several sunscreens and is known to work synergistically with UV filters. We prepared eight octocrylene-related compounds to test their photoprotective activities by measuring diffuse transmittance. The compounds had varied photoprotection profiles, with Sun Protection Factors (SPF) ranging from 1 to 5 and UVA Protection Factors (UVAPF) ranging from 1 to 8. Compounds 4, 5, and 7 showed the best protection against UVB sunrays, while compounds 5, 6, and 7 presented the best results for protection from UVA, so compound 7 had the most balanced protection overall. Results for compounds 4, 8, and 9 are reported for the first time in the literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5935/0100-4042.20140160

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among eight octocrylene (30)-related compounds (57-64), compounds 60, 61, and 63 displayed the best UVB protection effect, while compounds 61-63 presented the best results concerning protection against UVA.

    “Among these, 60, 61, and 63 displayed the best UVB protection effect, while compounds 61–63 presented the best results concerning protection against UVA.”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [130]

  • Compound 63 was the most promising octocrylene-related derivative and behaved as a broad band UVA/UVB filter.

    “The most promising derivative was 63, which behaved as a broad band UVA/UVB filter [130].”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [130]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 1 · Cited by 27

Authors
Polonini, H. C., Lopes, R. S., Beatriz, A., Gomes, R. S., Silva, A. O., Lima, R. V. D., Nunes, G. A., Brandão, M. A. F., Raposo, N. R. B., & Lima, D. P. D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
Venue
Química Nova
Published
2014
ISSN
0100-4042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120005379
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Química Nova (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
  • Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
  • Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
  • Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Photopolymerization techniques and applications
Keywords
octocrylene, UV filters, photoprotection, UVB protection, UVA protection, sun protection factor, UVA protection factor, diffuse transmittance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review