Cited by 0Information and Cyber SecurityInformation Technology Governance and StrategyPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From Information Security Governance to Data Protection Effectiveness: The Serial Mediating Roles of Security Policy Compliance and Cybersecurity Capability

Open access
Shalahudin, Mohammad Imam, Qn, Achmad Benny Mutiara, Alkalbani, Abdullah Said, Arisantoso, Anwar, Saipul, Mulya, Muhamad Femy·2026·Journal of Embedded Systems, Security and Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Purpose - This study examines the relationship between Information Security Governance (ISG) and Data Protection Effectiveness (DPE), focusing on the serial mediating roles of Security Policy Compliance (SPC) and Cybersecurity Capability (CC). Design/methods/approach – A quantitative explanatory approach was employed using a cross-sectional survey of 300 respondents selected through purposive sampling in Indonesia. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire comprising 33 indicators across four constructs and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4. Findings – The results revealed significant positive relationships between ISG and SPC (β = 0.493, p < 0.001), SPC and CC (β = 0.433, p < 0.001), and CC and DPE (β = 0.404, p < 0.001). The serial indirect relationship between ISG and DPE through SPC and CC was also significant (β = 0.086, p < 0.001). The model explained 45.4% of the variance in DPE. Research implications/limitations – The findings suggest that effective data protection requires coordinated governance, consistent security policy compliance, and organizational cybersecurity capabilities. However, the cross-sectional design, purposive sampling, and reliance on self-reported data limit causal interpretation and generalizability. Originality/value – This study integrates the Information Security Governance and Dynamic Capability perspectives within a Governance–Behavior–Capability–Outcome Framework. It extends existing cybersecurity research by identifying behavioral compliance and organizational capability as sequential mechanisms linking security governance with data protection effectiveness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.59562/jessi.v7i4.15218

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Shalahudin, M. I., Qn, A. B. M., Alkalbani, A. S., Arisantoso, Anwar, S., & Mulya, M. F.
Affiliations
  • Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Informasi NIIT (ID)
  • Gunadarma University (ID)
  • University of Buraimi (OM)
  • Tanri Abeng University (ID)
Venue
Journal of Embedded Systems, Security and Intelligent Systems
Published
2026-10-10
Pages
33-49
ISSN
  • 2722-273X (ISSN-L)
  • 2745-925X
OpenAlex
W7221359831
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Embedded Systems Security and Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
information security governance, security policy compliance, cybersecurity capabilities, serial mediation, dynamic capabilities, organizational cybersecurity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review