Cited by 1Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAI and HR TechnologiesEmployer Branding and e-HRM

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AI and HR: Exploring the Ethical Implications of Algorithmic Hiring

Mahapatra, Tamanna·2025·Training and Development Journal

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Human Resource Management (HRM), especially in hiring processes, has brought about significant transformation. AI-powered tools are increasingly employed to screen resumes, evaluate interviews, and predict candidate success, offering speed, efficiency, and consistency. However, careful consideration must be given to the ethical ramifications of such automation. Algorithmic bias, a lack of transparency, and risks to candidate privacy are major issues. Discrimination can be sustained by algorithms trained on skewed historical data, and accountability is hampered by opaque decision-making procedures. Privacy concerns are further raised by the gathering and use of personal information without express consent. These hazards are demonstrated by well-known instances like Hire Vue’s use of facial analysis and Amazon’s biased recruiting tool. This study explores real-life instances and regulatory developments and also investigates these ethical issues. The study suggests a paradigm that prioritizes bias audits, human oversight, transparency, and inclusive design to direct the ethical application of AI in recruiting. To guarantee equitable, responsible, and considerate AI use, it urges interdisciplinary cooperation between HR specialists, legal professionals, and technologists. In the end, even if AI has a lot of promise to improve hiring procedures, its application needs to be constrained by strict ethical guidelines. By ensuring that AI in hiring fosters fairness and equality rather than undercuts it, responsible adoption can assist firms in striking a balance between innovation and integrity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5958/2231-069x.2025.00001.8

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Barocas S., Hardt M., Narayanan A., 2019, Fairness and machine learning.
  2. Binns R., 2018, Algorithmic accountability and public reason, Philosophy & Technology, 31, 543, 10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cowgill B., Dell’Acqua F., Deng S., 2021, Biased programmers? Or biased data? A field experiment in operationalizing AI ethics, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 111, 47
  4. Kim P. T., 2017, Data-driven discrimination at work, William & Mary Law Review, 58, 857
  5. Raghavan M., Barocas S., Kleinberg J., Levy K., 2020, Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices, Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT), 469

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Mahapatra, T.
Affiliations
Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mahapatra, Tamanna
Venue
Training and Development Journal
Published
2025
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 2231-0681 (ISSN-L)
  • 2231-069X
OpenAlex
W4414713220
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Training & Development Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
automated hiring, artificial intelligence in human resource management, algorithmic bias, ethical implications of AI, transparency, discrimination, bias auditing, human oversight, inclusive design, AI regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review