The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AI and HR: Exploring the Ethical Implications of Algorithmic Hiring
Abstract
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Human Resource Management (HRM), especially in hiring processes, has brought about significant transformation. AI-powered tools are increasingly employed to screen resumes, evaluate interviews, and predict candidate success, offering speed, efficiency, and consistency. However, careful consideration must be given to the ethical ramifications of such automation. Algorithmic bias, a lack of transparency, and risks to candidate privacy are major issues. Discrimination can be sustained by algorithms trained on skewed historical data, and accountability is hampered by opaque decision-making procedures. Privacy concerns are further raised by the gathering and use of personal information without express consent. These hazards are demonstrated by well-known instances like Hire Vue’s use of facial analysis and Amazon’s biased recruiting tool. This study explores real-life instances and regulatory developments and also investigates these ethical issues. The study suggests a paradigm that prioritizes bias audits, human oversight, transparency, and inclusive design to direct the ethical application of AI in recruiting. To guarantee equitable, responsible, and considerate AI use, it urges interdisciplinary cooperation between HR specialists, legal professionals, and technologists. In the end, even if AI has a lot of promise to improve hiring procedures, its application needs to be constrained by strict ethical guidelines. By ensuring that AI in hiring fosters fairness and equality rather than undercuts it, responsible adoption can assist firms in striking a balance between innovation and integrity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As per [6], AI hiring is creating ethical problems. It creates bias, transparency issues, and risk candidate's personal information.”
From Mitigating Bias in Retail AI Hiring Tools: A Human-Centered H-A-I-R-E Governance Framework for Low-Wage Hires (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372873 · Cited by 2,245
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017) · International Data Privacy Law · doi:10.1093/idpl/ipx005 · Cited by 1,308
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.00973 · Cited by 179
Is that your final decision? Multi-stage profiling, selective effects, and Article 22 of the GDPR
Binns, R., & Veale, M. (2021) · International Data Privacy Law · doi:10.1093/idpl/ipab020 · Cited by 65
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Barocas S., Hardt M., Narayanan A., 2019, Fairness and machine learning.
- Binns R., 2018, Algorithmic accountability and public reason, Philosophy & Technology, 31, 543, 10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Cowgill B., Dell’Acqua F., Deng S., 2021, Biased programmers? Or biased data? A field experiment in operationalizing AI ethics, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 111, 47
- Kim P. T., 2017, Data-driven discrimination at work, William & Mary Law Review, 58, 857
- Raghavan M., Barocas S., Kleinberg J., Levy K., 2020, Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices, Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT), 469
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chopra, Y., & Hashemi, S. (2026) · 2026 ASEE- NE Section Conference Proceedings · doi:10.18260/1-2--58593
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahapatra, T.
- Affiliations
- Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Mahapatra, Tamanna
- Venue
- Training and Development Journal
- Publisher
- Diva Enterprises Private Limited
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 2231-0681 (ISSN-L)
- 2231-069X
- OpenAlex
- W4414713220
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Training & Development Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Keywords
- automated hiring, artificial intelligence in human resource management, algorithmic bias, ethical implications of AI, transparency, discrimination, bias auditing, human oversight, inclusive design, AI regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review