The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Marronage in Esmeraldas, Ecuador: A Historical Review
Open accessAbstract
This article deals with the history of marronage in the province of Esmeraldas in attempt to make sense of what has been called the “racial/spatial order” in Esmeraldas. (Rahier 2014). The argument stringing together the article is that autonomy has been the bedrock of claims to territoriality for the Black population of the region, a territoriality that is deeply imbricated with the experiences of marronage in the region. Further, the chapter will highlight the political, economic and ideological challenges faced by a group attempting to change its position and how such challenges shape the very nature of the struggle that is being carried out. Thus, our concern is with Esmeraldas’ history through the lens of marronage wherein marronage is explored, among other things, through the question of territory and autonomy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganguly, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Delhi (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Ganguly, Tathagato
- Venue
- Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publisher
- Diva Enterprises Private Limited
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 13-27
- ISSN
- 2249-7315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389952730
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Afro-Latin American Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History and Politics in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Caribbean history, culture, and politics
- Keywords
- marronage, Esmeraldas, Black population, territoriality, autonomy, territorial struggles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review