Cited by 18Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesAvian ecology and behavior

Stuktur und Verteilung von Tastrezeptoren im Schnabel-Zungenbereich von Singvögeln, im besonderen der Fringillidae

Open access
Krulis, V·1978·Revue suisse de zoologie.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5962/bhl.part.82241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Mesozoic toothed birds, a single large neurovascular opening is present on the distal premaxillae and dentaries, continuous with the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve, respectively.

    “In Mesozoic toothed birds, a single large neurovascular opening is present on the distal premaxillae and dentaries, continuous with the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve, respectively.”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [89]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krulis, V
Corresponding author
Krulis, V
Venue
Revue suisse de zoologie.
Published
1978
Volume
85
Pages
385-447
ISSN
0035-418X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2290063784
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Revue suisse de zoologie (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
tactile receptors, songbirds, Fringillidae, receptor distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review