Cited by 5Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Avian features of Archaeopteryx feeding apparatus reflect elevated demands of flight

Open access
O’Connor, Jingmai K., Clark, Alexander D., Kuo, Pei-Chen, Wang, Min, Shinya, Akiko, Van Beek, Constance, Chang, Huali·2026·The Innovation

Abstract

The hypothalamus, an "ancient" subcortical brain structure, maintains physiological homeostasis and controls native behaviors. The evolution of homeostatic regulation and behavioral control in mammals may rely on adaptable neuronal identity establishment but conserved neural patterning mechanisms during neurodevelopment. Here, we combined single-cell, single-nucleus, and spatial transcriptomic datasets to map the spatial patterning of diverse progenitor domains and reconstruct their neurogenic lineages in the developing human and mouse hypothalamus. While the regional organizers orchestrating neural patterning are conserved between primates and rodents, we identified a human-enriched neuronal subtype and found a substantial increase in neuromodulatory gene expression among human neurons. Furthermore, cross-species comparison demonstrated a potential redistribution of two neuroendocrine neuronal subtypes and a shift in inter-transmitter and transmitter-peptide coupling within hypothalamic dopamine neurons. Together, our study lays a critical foundation for understanding cellular development and evolution of the mammalian hypothalamus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xinn.2025.101086

Cites

64 of 65 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ossified basihyal is only otherwise known in Microraptor, a volant dromaeosaurid.

    “The latter is only otherwise known in Microraptor , a volant dromaeosaurid [86].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Discussion (‘Co-evolution of oral papillae and the mobile tongue’) says that outside Aves, an ossified basihyal is documented only in Microraptor, which it calls ‘probably volant.’ But the Discussion (‘Food for flight’) also names Confuciusornis and Hongshanornis as previously known examples. The unqualified ‘only otherwise known’ omits those birds and states flight more definitively than the source does. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Chicago Archaeopteryx preserves an ossified basihyal, which suggests hyolingual suspension and the presence of complex tongue musculature indicating increased tongue mobility relative to non-volant theropods.

    “The Chicago Archaeopteryx also preserves an ossified basihyal, which suggests hyolingual suspension and the presence of complex tongue musculature indicating increased tongue mobility relative to non-volant theropods [86].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [86]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [5]Gill F.B. Ornithology 3rd Edition 2007 W.H. Freeman and Company
  2. [25]McLelland J. Apparatus digestorius (Systema alimentarium) Baumel J.J. King A.S. Breazile J.E. Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium Second Edition 1993 Nuttall Ornithological Club 301 327
  3. [48]Wellnhofer P. Archaeopteryx, English Edition: The Icon of Evolution 2009 Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil
  4. [52]Baumel J.J. King A.S. Breazile J.E. Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium Second Edition 1993 Publ Nuttall Ornithol Club. Nuttall Ornithological Club
  5. [65]Chiappe L.M. Meng Q.-J. Birds of Stone 2016 John Hopkins University Press
  6. [68]Dubale M.S. Thomas V.C. The epidermal structures of the tongue and the buccal cavity of the Brahminy Myna (Sturnus pagodarum Gmelin) and the Wagtail (Motacillaflava thunbergi Billberg) Acta Zool. 59 1978 149 155 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1978.tb01030.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Connor, J. K., Clark, A. D., Kuo, P.-C., Wang, M., Shinya, A., Van Beek, C., & Chang, H.
Affiliations
  • Field Museum of Natural History (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
The Innovation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-02
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
101086
ISSN
2666-6758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413738998
Cited by
5
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Archaeopteryx, feeding apparatus, rostrum, mechanoreception, basihyal, tongue mobility, toothed birds, flight energetics, theropod dinosaurs, flight evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review