Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

North American Quaternary Canis

Open access
Nowak, Ronald M.·1979·Monograph of the Museum of Natural History, the University of Kansas

Abstract

C sis based on those populations represented by large series of complete skulls.This analysis serves to delineate special groups and to assess the probable origin and relationship of questionable populations.The BMD07M program of multivariate analysis was a pri- mary method employed in this study.The second main part of the paper consists of descriptions of each recognized species of North American Canis.Some of the speci- mens discussed, including many of the fossils, could not be used in multivariate analysis, but the descriptions are supported in part by uni- variate and bivariate statistics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5962/bhl.title.4072

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Nowak, R. M.
Venue
Monograph of the Museum of Natural History, the University of Kansas
Published
1979
ISSN
0085-2465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171900381
Cited by
198
References
1
FWCI
1.47
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: North American Quaternary Canis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5962/bhl.title.4072
The paper
Nowak, R. M. (1979). North American Quaternary Canis. Monograph of the Museum of Natural History, the University of Kansas. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4072

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.