Cited by 30Marriage and Sexual RelationshipsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceptions of Infidelity: A Comparison of Sexual, Emotional, Cyber-, and Parasocial Behaviors

Open access
Adam, Aimee·2019·Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships

Abstract

Previous research indicates that extradyadic sexual behaviors and other behaviors including emotional infidelity, pornography use, and online infidelity are considered to be acts of betrayal. However, perceptions of infidelity occurring through social media and of romantic parasocial relationships (one-sided romantic attachments formed with media figures) have not been well researched. In two exploratory studies, I examined a) the extent to which participants rated parasocial, sexual, emotional, and social media behaviors as infidelity, and b) how hurtful these behaviors would be if a partner were to enact them. I also examined how often participants reported having been negatively affected by their partner’s parasocial romances. Results indicate that activities such as sexting and sexy Snapchatting are perceived similarly to both cybersex and physical sexual infidelity, and that parasocial infidelity is seen similarly to pornography use. These similarities apply to whether the acts are seen as infidelity, and in terms of the emotional pain the acts may cause. These results indicate that extradyadic social media and parasocial behaviors can be negatively perceived, and may be likely to negatively affect real-life romantic relationships.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5964/ijpr.v13i2.376

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.5964/ijpr.v7i1.106 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01556.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/147470491401200106 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/00224490109552087 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/0361684311414537 · DOI
  6. 10.1089/cyber.2012.0424 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/1467-8721.00143 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00674.x · DOI
  9. Harkness, E. (2014). Internet pornography: Associations with sexual risk behaviour, sexual scripts and use within relationships. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2123/12808
  10. 10.1007/s40806-015-0010-z · DOI
  11. 10.1521/jscp.2012.31.4.410 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/00926230591006719 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/02699930143000202 · DOI
  15. Schnarre, 2017, Parasocial romances as infidelity: Comparing perceptions of real-life, online, and parasocial extradyadic relationships., Journal of the Indiana Academy of Social Sciences, 82
  16. 10.1080/10720160008400206 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1080/00926239508404399 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s11199-015-0518-5 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/00224499.2010.516845 · DOI
  20. Tukachinsky, 2011, Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale., American Journal of Media Psychology, 73
  21. 10.1089/109493103322725342 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/0894439304271536 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/00224540903366750 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences

    Rokach, A., & Chan, S. H. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20053904 · Cited by 77

    “In her research, Adam found that flirting or sexual behavior conducted via social media is indeed perceived similarly not only to cyber-sexual behaviors but also to physical sexual infidelity, which is similarly hurtful to romantic relationships [98].”
    Background

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Adam, A.
Affiliations
Indiana University Southeast (US)
Corresponding author
Adam, Aimee
Venue
Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships
Published
2019-12-20
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
237-252
ISSN
1981-6472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995468205
Cited by
30
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Interpersona An International Journal on Personal Relationships (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe’s Journal of Psychology (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PsychOpen Gold (Leibniz Institute for Psychology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Psychology Archives (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
infidelity, emotional infidelity, cybersex, sexting, parasocial relationships, pornography use, betrayal, emotional pain, romantic relationships, Snapchat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review