Cited by 348Marriage and Sexual RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

INFIDELITY IN COMMITTED RELATI0NSHIPS II: A SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW

Blow, Adrian J., Hartnett, Kelley·2005·Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

Abstract

This article, a follow-up on our methodological review of infidelity studies, provides a substantive review of the research findings on infidelity in committed relationships. The aim of this article is to present the most conclusive findings available to both researcher and practitioner on the subject of infidelity. We highlight attitudes toward infidelity; prevalence data; types of infidelity; gender dynamics and infidelity; issues in the primary relationship and their relationship to infidelity; race, culture, and infidelity; education, income, employment, and infidelity; justifications for infidelity; individual issues and their relationship to infidelity; same-sex couples and infidelity; attachment and infidelity; opportunity and infidelity; the aftermath and recovery process from infidelity; and clinical practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01556.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The traumatic reactions caused by infidelity emulate behaviors and attitudes seen in a disorganized attachment style, with immense emotional, psychological and cognitive dysregulation evident among afflicted romantic partners.

    “The traumatic reactions caused by infidelity emulate behaviors and attitudes seen in a disorganized attachment style as immense emotional, psychological and cognitive dysregulation is evident amongst these afflicted romantic partners [5,30].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [5]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Blow, Adrian J.
Venue
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
217-233
ISSN
  • 0194-472X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0606
OpenAlex
W2017803461
Cited by
348
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 21
FWCI
23.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
infidelity, committed relationships, attitudes toward infidelity, gender differences, race and culture, socioeconomic factors, same-sex couples, attachment, opportunity, clinical practice
MeSH terms
Culture, Ethnicity, Extramarital Relations, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review