Cited by 61Stress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutResilience and Mental Health

Improving Resiliency in Healthcare Employees

Werneburg, Brooke L., Jenkins, Sarah M., Friend, Jamie L., Berkland, Bridget E., Clark, Matthew M., Rosedahl, Jordan K., Preston, Heather R., Daniels, Denise C. +3 more·2018·American Journal of Health Behavior

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The high prevalence of stress at the workplace has been well documented; however, few studies have investigated the efficacy of worksite resiliency programs. Therefore, the objec- tive of this project was to examine the impact of a worksite resilience training program on improving resiliency and health behaviors in healthcare employees. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2016, 137 adult wellness center members of a healthcare institution participating in a single-arm cohort study of a 12-week resiliency training program were assessed at baseline, end of intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Statistically significant (p ≤ .01) improvements were seen at the end of the intervention and extending to 3 months follow-up for resiliency, perceived stress, anxiety level, quality of life, and health behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the premise that worksite programs designed to improve resiliency in healthcare employees have efficacy in improving resiliency, quality of life and health behaviors. Given the importance of stress and burnout in healthcare employees, future randomized studies are warranted to determine more clearly the impacts of this type of resiliency intervention for improving the wellness of healthcare workers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5993/ajhb.42.1.4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werneburg, B. L., Jenkins, S. M., Friend, J. L., Berkland, B. E., Clark, M. M., Rosedahl, J. K., Preston, H. R., Daniels, D. C., Riley, B. A., Olsen, K. D., & Sood, A.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Olmsted County Public Health, Rochester, MN, USA
Venue
American Journal of Health Behavior
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
39-50
ISSN
1087-3244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2783467487
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mayo Clinic
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
resilience training, worksite wellness programs, healthcare workers, occupational stress, burnout, perceived stress, anxiety, quality of life, health behavior, workplace wellness
MeSH terms
Adult, Burnout, Professional, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Health Behavior, Occupational Health, Workplace, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review