When Despair and Hope Meet the Stigma of “Manipulation” and “Ambivalence”
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ambivalence can be validated as a sign of hope and encourage motivation and belief in recovery.
“the experience of ambivalence can be validated as a sign of hope, and encourage motivation and belief in recovery.”
From A lived experience response to the proposed diagnosis of terminal anorexia nervosa: learning from iatrogenic harm, ambivalence and enduring hope (2023) · cites this paper as [192]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elwyn, R. (2023) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-022-00729-0 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Townsend, H. (2023) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/08861099231209760 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
«Jeg ville dø, men er jo glad jeg lever»
Vatne, M. E., & Nåden, D. (2018) · Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid · doi:10.18261/issn.1504-3010-2018-01-04 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bergmans, Y., Rowe, A., Dineen, M., & Johnson, D.
- ORCID
- Bergmans, Yvonne
- Venue
- Critical Suicidology
- Publisher
- University of British Columbia Press
- Published
- 2015-12-02
- Pages
- 133-153
- OpenAlex
- W4385599881
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of British Columbia Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- manipulation, ambivalence, stigma, despair, hope
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
