Assessing Medication Adherence in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine and compare the prevalence of nonadherence in lung, kidney, and liver transplant recipients, and identify potential risk factors for nonadherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional, single-center, retrospective cohort study, evaluated 225 outpatient lung, kidney, and liver transplant recipients' adherence to immunosuppressant medication. Based on immunosuppressant dosages and dispensing records, medication possession ratio (days of medication supplied/actual days) and gaps in prescription refills (> 30-day lapse between expected depletion of supply and next refill) were used as surrogate markers in assessing adherence for 2 years. Patients were adherent to their immunosuppressant medication regimens if their medication possession ratio was ≥ 80%. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was slightly greater than 50 years of age, and they were a median of 2.0, 1.3, and 1.1 years posttransplant at the start of data collection for lung, kidney, and liver recipients. Overall medication possession ratios were 95.4% ± 7.5%, 95.9% ± 7.6%, and 92.7% ± 12.3% in our lung, kidney, and liver recipients. Only 7.1% of patients had a medication possession ratio lower than 80%, which was the cutoff for nonadherence. No statistical analyses were performed to identify potential factors for nonadherence because of the small number of nonadherent patients. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressant medication adherence at our center was high for all 3 organ cohorts, as measured by a medication possession ratio of 80% or better. Further study is needed to evaluate immunosuppressant adherence over time after transplant, and confirm the clinical factors that optimize adherence in high-risk patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other groups used the discrepancy between immunosuppressant dosages and prescription refills or data from health insurances for the assessment of adherence.
“Other groups used the discrepancy between immunosuppressant dosages and prescription refills or data from health insurances for the assessment of adherence[35,36].”
From Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation (2019) · cites this paper as [35]
Cites
Adherence to the Medical Regimen During the First Two Years After Lung Transplantation
Dew, M. A., DiMartini, A. F., De Vito Dabbs, A., Zomak, R., De Geest, S., Dobbels, F., Myaskovsky, L., Switzer, G. E., Unruh, M., Steel, J. L., et al. (2008) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e318160135f · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Nonadherent Behaviors After Solid Organ Transplantation
Germani, G., Lazzaro, S., Gnoato, F., Senzolo, M., Borella, V., Rupolo, G., Cillo, U., Rigotti, P., Feltrin, G., Loy, M., et al. (2011) · Transplantation Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.103 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation
Bertram, A., Fuge, J., Suhling, H., Tudorache, I., Haverich, A., Welte, T., & Gottlieb, J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226167 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Other groups used the discrepancy between immunosuppressant dosages and prescription refills or data from health insurances for the assessment of adherence[35,36].”
Method
- Authors
- Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, V. G. H., Su, G. C.-W., Greanya, E. D., Partovi, N., Yoshida, E. M., Shapiro, R. J., & Levy, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Vancouver General Hospital (CA)
- Venue
- Experimental and Clinical Transplantation
- Publisher
- Baskent University
- Published
- 2013-11-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 475-481
- ISSN
- 1304-0855 (ISSN-L)
- 2146-8427
- OpenAlex
- W2317561229
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental and Clinical Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Keywords
- medication adherence, immunosuppressive therapy, solid organ transplant recipients, lung transplantation, kidney transplantation, liver transplantation, medication possession ratio, prescription refills, risk factors for non-adherence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Graft Rejection, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Kidney Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Lung Transplantation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review