Cited by 15Medication Adherence and ComplianceRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsPharmacy and Medical Practices

Assessing Medication Adherence in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients

Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Su, Gloria Chun-Wei, Greanya, Erica D., Partovi, Nilufar, Yoshida, Eric M., Shapiro, R. Jean, Levy, Robert D.·2013·Experimental and Clinical Transplantation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine and compare the prevalence of nonadherence in lung, kidney, and liver transplant recipients, and identify potential risk factors for nonadherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional, single-center, retrospective cohort study, evaluated 225 outpatient lung, kidney, and liver transplant recipients' adherence to immunosuppressant medication. Based on immunosuppressant dosages and dispensing records, medication possession ratio (days of medication supplied/actual days) and gaps in prescription refills (> 30-day lapse between expected depletion of supply and next refill) were used as surrogate markers in assessing adherence for 2 years. Patients were adherent to their immunosuppressant medication regimens if their medication possession ratio was ≥ 80%. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was slightly greater than 50 years of age, and they were a median of 2.0, 1.3, and 1.1 years posttransplant at the start of data collection for lung, kidney, and liver recipients. Overall medication possession ratios were 95.4% ± 7.5%, 95.9% ± 7.6%, and 92.7% ± 12.3% in our lung, kidney, and liver recipients. Only 7.1% of patients had a medication possession ratio lower than 80%, which was the cutoff for nonadherence. No statistical analyses were performed to identify potential factors for nonadherence because of the small number of nonadherent patients. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressant medication adherence at our center was high for all 3 organ cohorts, as measured by a medication possession ratio of 80% or better. Further study is needed to evaluate immunosuppressant adherence over time after transplant, and confirm the clinical factors that optimize adherence in high-risk patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6002/ect.2013.0060

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other groups used the discrepancy between immunosuppressant dosages and prescription refills or data from health insurances for the assessment of adherence.

    “Other groups used the discrepancy between immunosuppressant dosages and prescription refills or data from health insurances for the assessment of adherence[35,36].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, V. G. H., Su, G. C.-W., Greanya, E. D., Partovi, N., Yoshida, E. M., Shapiro, R. J., & Levy, R. D.
Affiliations
Vancouver General Hospital (CA)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Transplantation
Published
2013-11-28
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
475-481
ISSN
  • 1304-0855 (ISSN-L)
  • 2146-8427
OpenAlex
W2317561229
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, immunosuppressive therapy, solid organ transplant recipients, lung transplantation, kidney transplantation, liver transplantation, medication possession ratio, prescription refills, risk factors for non-adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Graft Rejection, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Kidney Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Lung Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review