Cited by 49Cancer survivorship and carePhysical Activity and HealthCancer Risks and Factors

Are We on the Same Page? Patient and Provider Perceptions About Exercise in Cancer Care: A Focus Group Study

Smaradottir, Agnes, Smith, Angela L., Borgert, Andrew J., Oettel, Kurt R.·2017·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) during and after cancer treatment can help with symptom management and reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. However, it is unclear what constitutes an optimal exercise program. In addition, provider and patient barriers exist to the recommendation and adoption of exercise as part of a cancer treatment plan. The goal of this study was to determine how providers and patients feel about exercise during cancer treatment and explore what the barriers to implementing such a program might be. Patients and Methods: Focus groups and interviews were held with patients with malignancy, both metastatic and nonmetastatic, and oncology providers. In total, 20 patients participated in either a focus group or an individual interview and 9 providers contributed to the focus group. An equal number of patients (n=10) were interviewed as attended a focus group. Audiotaped sessions were transcribed verbatim. Theme identification was independently coded by 4 coders and synthesized as a group. Results: Neither patient group recalled PA instruction from oncology providers during their cancer treatment. Most participants (95%) felt exercise is important during cancer treatment, citing overall well-being benefits versus improved disease outcome. Most patients (80%) preferred a home-based exercise program provided by the oncologist. Fatigue was the most cited barrier to regular exercise during treatment (50%). All providers acknowledged benefits of PA to patients, but not universally for all. More than half of providers (55%) preferred a referral system for exercise programs. Clinic visit time constraints and a perceived lack of expertise in the area of PA were common barriers to making exercise recommendations a routine part of the treatment plan. Conclusions: Patients with cancer and oncologists recognize the benefits of PA during treatment. Disagreement exists between to whom, how, and where exercise plans should be disseminated and implemented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0061

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observed barriers to clinicians referring patients to exercise programming include lack of awareness of the potential value of exercise in cancer populations, uncertainty regarding the safety or suitability of exercise for a particular patient, lack of awareness regarding available programs, need for education and skills development for making referrals, and a belief that referrals to exercise编程

    “Observed barriers to clinicians referring patients to exercise programming include lack of awareness of the potential value of exercise in cancer populations, uncertainty regarding the safety or suitability of exercise for a particular patient, lack of awareness regarding available programs to help facilitate exercise in cancer populations, need for education and skills development for making”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smaradottir, A., Smith, A. L., Borgert, A. J., & Oettel, K. R.
Affiliations
  • Gundersen Medical Foundation (US)
  • Gundersen Health System (US)
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2017-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
588-594
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
OpenAlex
W2611956337
Cited by
49
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
exercise during cancer treatment, physical activity, barriers to exercise, fatigue, home-based exercise, exercise referral, oncology providers, cancer patients, metastatic cancer, symptom management, cancer recurrence risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Cancer Care Facilities, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Physician-Patient Relations, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review