Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Open access
von Mehren, Margaret, Kane, John M., Agulnik, Mark, Bui, Marilyn M., Carr-Ascher, Janai, Choy, Edwin, Connelly, Mary, Dry, Sarah, Ganjoo, Kristen N., Gonzalez, Ricardo J., Holder, Ashley, Homsi, Jade, Keedy, Vicki, Kelly, Ciara M., Kim, Edward, Liebner, David, McCarter, Martin, McGarry, Sean V., Mesko, Nathan W., Meyer, Christian, Pappo, Alberto S., Parkes, Amanda M., Petersen, Ivy A., Pollack, Seth M., Poppe, Matthew, Riedel, Richard F., Schuetze, Scott, Shabason, Jacob, Sicklick, Jason K., Spraker, Matthew B., Zimel, Melissa, Hang, Lisa E., Sundar, Hema, Bergman, Mary Anne·2022·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0035
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Soft Tissue Sarcoma provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines discusses general principles for the diagnosis and treatment of retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, outlines treatment recommendations, and reviews the evidence to support the guidelines recommendations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0035

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,182

Metadata

Authors
von Mehren, M., Kane, J. M., Agulnik, M., Bui, M. M., Carr-Ascher, J., Choy, E., Connelly, M., Dry, S., Ganjoo, K. N., Gonzalez, R. J., Holder, A., Homsi, J., Keedy, V., Kelly, C. M., Kim, E., Liebner, D., McCarter, M., McGarry, S. V., Mesko, N. W., Meyer, C., Pappo, A. S., Parkes, A. M., Petersen, I. A., Pollack, S. M., Poppe, M., Riedel, R. F., Schuetze, S., Shabason, J., Sicklick, J. K., Spraker, M. B., Zimel, M., Hang, L. E., Sundar, H., & Bergman, M. A.
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Publisher
Harborside Press, LLC
Published
2022-07
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
815-833
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
DOI
10.6004/jnccn.2022.0035
OpenAlex
W4285097283
Cited by
1,182
References
2
FWCI
46.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0035
The paper
von Mehren, M., Kane, J. M., Agulnik, M., Bui, M. M., Carr-Ascher, J., Choy, E., Connelly, M., Dry, S., Ganjoo, K. N., Gonzalez, R. J., Holder, A., Homsi, J., Keedy, V., Kelly, C. M., Kim, E., Liebner, D., McCarter, M., McGarry, S. V., Mesko, N. W., . . . Bergman, M. A. (2022). Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.