Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Ovarian Cancer, Version 3.2022: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines

Armstrong, Deborah K., Alvarez, Ronald D., Backes, Floor J., Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N., Barroilhet, Lisa, Behbakht, Kian, Berchuck, Andrew, Chen, Lee-may, Chitiyo, Viola C., Cristea, Mihaela, DeRosa, Maria, Eisenhauer, Eric L., Gershenson, David M., Gray, Heidi J., Grisham, Rachel, Hakam, Ardeshir, Jain, Angela, Karam, Amer, Konecny, Gottfried E., Leath III, Charles A., Leiserowitz, Gary, Liu, Joyce, Martin, Lainie, Matei, Daniela, McHale, Michael, McLean, Karen, Miller, David S., Percac-Lima, Sanja, Remmenga, Steven W., Schorge, John, Stewart, Daphne, Thaker, Premal H., Vargas, Roberto, Hendrickson, Andrea Wahner, Werner, Theresa L., Zsiros, Emese, Dwyer, Mary A., Hang, Lisa·2022·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States, with less than half of patients living >5 years following diagnosis. The NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines, including revised guidance on alternative chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced age and/or comorbidities, a new algorithm for recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma based on developing research and novel therapeutic agents, and updated language regarding tumor molecular analysis applications in ovarian cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0047

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Armstrong, D. K., Alvarez, R. D., Backes, F. J., Bakkum-Gamez, J. N., Barroilhet, L., Behbakht, K., Berchuck, A., Chen, L.-M., Chitiyo, V. C., Cristea, M., DeRosa, M., Eisenhauer, E. L., Gershenson, D. M., Gray, H. J., Grisham, R., Hakam, A., Jain, A., Karam, A., Konecny, G. E., Leath III, C. A., Leiserowitz, G., Liu, J., Martin, L., Matei, D., McHale, M., McLean, K., Miller, D. S., Percac-Lima, S., Remmenga, S. W., Schorge, J., Stewart, D., Thaker, P. H., Vargas, R., Hendrickson, A. W., Werner, T. L., Zsiros, E., Dwyer, M. A., & Hang, L.
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2022-09
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
972-980
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
OpenAlex
W4294982904
Cited by
401
References
37
FWCI
59.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Ovarian Cancer, Version 3.2022: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0047
The paper
Armstrong, D. K., Alvarez, R. D., Backes, F. J., Bakkum-Gamez, J. N., Barroilhet, L., Behbakht, K., Berchuck, A., Chen, L.-M., Chitiyo, V. C., Cristea, M., DeRosa, M., Eisenhauer, E. L., Gershenson, D. M., Gray, H. J., Grisham, R., Hakam, A., Jain, A., Karam, A., Konecny, G. E., . . . Hang, L. (2022). NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Ovarian Cancer, Version 3.2022: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.