The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of Metal Powders Used for Additive Manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) techniques can produce complex, high-value metal parts, with potential applications as critical parts, such as those found in aerospace components. The production of AM parts with consistent and predictable properties requires input materials (e.g., metal powders) with known and repeatable characteristics, which in turn requires standardized measurement methods for powder properties. First, based on our previous work, we assess the applicability of current standardized methods for powder characterization for metal AM powders. Then we present the results of systematic studies carried out on two different powder materials used for additive manufacturing: stainless steel and cobalt-chrome. The characterization of these powders is important in NIST efforts to develop appropriate measurements and standards for additive materials and to document the property of powders used in a NIST-led additive manufacturing material round robin. An extensive array of characterization techniques was applied to these two powders, in both virgin and recycled states. The physical techniques included laser diffraction particle size analysis, X-ray computed tomography for size and shape analysis, and optical and scanning electron microscopy. Techniques sensitive to structure and chemistry, including X-ray diffraction, energy dispersive analytical X-ray analysis using the X-rays generated during scanning electron microscopy, and X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy were also employed. The results of these analyses show how virgin powder changes after being exposed to and recycled from one or more Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) additive manufacturing build cycles. In addition, these findings can give insight into the actual additive manufacturing process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties
DebRoy, T., Wei, H. L., Zuback, J. S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., Milewski, J. O., Beese, A. M., Wilson-Heid, A., De, A., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 · Cited by 8,805
Zhao, C., Fezzaa, K., Cunningham, R. W., Wen, H., De Carlo, F., Chen, L., Rollett, A. D., & Sun, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03761-2 · Cited by 758
About metastable cellular structure in additively manufactured austenitic stainless steels
Kong, D., Dong, C., Wei, S., Ni, X., Zhang, L., Li, R., Wang, L., Man, C., & Li, X. (2021) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101804 · Cited by 528
Non-beam-based metal additive manufacturing enabled by additive friction stir deposition
Yu, H. Z., Jones, M. E., Brady, G. W., Griffiths, R. J., Garcia, D., Rauch, H. A., Cox, C. D., & Hardwick, N. (2018) · Scripta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.025 · Cited by 361
Progress and Opportunities for Machine Learning in Materials and Processes of Additive Manufacturing
Ng, W. L., Goh, G. L., Goh, G. D., Ten, J. S. J., & Yeong, W. Y. (2024) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202310006 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Slotwinski, J. A., Garboczi, E. J., Stutzman, P. E., Ferraris, C. F., Watson, S. S., & Peltz, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 460
- ISSN
- 1044-677X (ISSN-L)
- 2165-7254
- OpenAlex
- W2333451148
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Metal Powders Used for Additive Manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6028/jres.119.018
- The paper
- Slotwinski, J. A., Garboczi, E. J., Stutzman, P. E., Ferraris, C. F., Watson, S. S., & Peltz, M. A. (2014). Characterization of Metal Powders Used for Additive Manufacturing. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.