The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0
Open accessAbstract
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 provides guidance to industry, government agencies, and other organizations to manage cybersecurity risks. It offers a taxonomy of high-level cybersecurity outcomes that can be used by any organization — regardless of its size, sector, or maturity — to better understand, assess, prioritize, and communicate its cybersecurity efforts. The CSF does not prescribe how outcomes should be achieved. Rather, it links to resources that provide additional guidance on practices and controls that could be used to achieve those outcomes. This document explains CSF 2.0 and its components and describes some of the many ways that it can be used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Complementary to ZTA, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 released in 2024 [6] and the Cybersecurity Performance Goals [3] provide actionable implementation guidance for organizations initiating trust transformation programs in OT environments.”
From Zero Trust Architecture for Smart Factories: Securing Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical OT Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0, released in 2024, further embeds these principles within a broader enterprise risk governance structure applicable to critical infrastructure sectors including manufacturing.[6]”
From Zero Trust Architecture for Smart Factories: Securing Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical OT Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The proposed architecture is explicitly designed to align with and extend the IEC 62443 industrial security standard and NIST CSF 2.0, enabling organizations with existing compliance programs to adopt this framework as a coherent extension rather than a competing model.[4], [6], [8]”
From Zero Trust Architecture for Smart Factories: Securing Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical OT Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The architecture proposed in this study aligns structurally with NIST CSF 2.0, and suggests potential validity and practical applicability as a strategic security model [2].”
From Towards Secure Legacy Manufacturing: A Policy-Driven Zero Trust Architecture Aligned with NIST CSF 2.0 (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Incident response recommendations and considerations for cybersecurity risk management :
Nelson, A. J., Rekhi, S. J., Souppaya, M., & Scarfone, K. A. (2025) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-61r3 · Cited by 141
Managing workplace AI risks and the future of work
Howard, J., & Schulte, P. A. (2024) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.23653 · Cited by 59
Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management Practices for Systems and Organizations
Boyens, J. M. (2024) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-161r1-upd1 · Cited by 52
Cybersecurity in smart agriculture: A systematic literature review
Campoverde‐Molina, M., & Luján‐Mora, S. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104284 · Cited by 47
VISTA: An inclusive insider threat taxonomy, with mitigation strategies
Renaud, K., Warkentin, M. E., Pogrebna, G., & van der Schyff, K. (2023) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2023.103877 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Published
- 2024-02-26
- OpenAlex
- W4385562826
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 160 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 28
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Funders
- Information Technology Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
- Keywords
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework, cyber risk management, cybersecurity maturity, risk assessment, risk prioritization, cybersecurity controls, cybersecurity practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
