CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 296Cryptography and Data SecurityCryptography and Residue ArithmeticQuantum Information and Cryptography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Status report on the second round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process

Open access
Moody, Dustin, Alagic, Gorjan, Apon, Daniel C, Cooper, David A, Dang, Quynh H, Kelsey, John M, Liu, Yi-Kai, Miller, Carl A, Peralta, Rene C, Perlner, Ray A, Robinson, Angela Y, Smith-Tone, Daniel C, Alperin-Sheriff, Jacob·2020
DOI 10.6028/nist.ir.8309
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the Nation's measurement and standards infrastructure.ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analyses to advance the development and productive use of information technology.ITL's responsibilities include the development of management, administrative, technical, and physical standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of other than national security-related information in federal information systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6028/nist.ir.8309

Cites

39 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Moody D (2016) Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization: Announcement and outline of NIST's Call for Submissions. International Conference on Post-Quantum Cryptography -PQCrypto. Available at https://csrc.nist.gov/Presentations/2016/Announcement-and-outline-of- NIST-s-Call-for-Submis
  2. Workshop on Cybersecurity in a Post-Quantum World. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, April 2-3, 2015. Available at https://csrc.nist.gov/Events/2015/Workshop-on-Cybersecurity- in-a-Post-Quantum-World.
  3. Bernstein D, Lange T (eds.), eBACS: ECRYPT Benchmarking of Cryptographic Systems -SUPERCOP (2020). Available at https://bench.cr.yp.to/supercop.html
  4. Eiichiro F, Okamoto T (1999) Secure Integration of Asymmetric and Symmetric Encryption Schemes. Annual International Cryptology Conference -CRYPTO (Springer), pp. 537-544. https://doi.org/10.5555/646764.706343 · DOI
  5. Erdem A, Ducas L, Pöppelmann T, Schwabe P (2016) Post-quantum key exchange-a new hope. USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX association), pp. 327-343. https://doi.org/10.5555/3241094.3241120 · DOI
  6. Lyubashevsky V, Peikert C, Regev O (2010) On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors over Rings. Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques -EUROCRYPT (Springer), pp. 1- 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12190-5_1 · DOI
  7. Greuet A, Montoya S, Renault G (2020) Attack on LAC Key Exchange in Misuse Situation. Cryptology ePrint Archive preprint. https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/063

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–295 of 295

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Moody, D., Alagic, G., Apon, D. C., Cooper, D. A., Dang, Q. H., Kelsey, J. M., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C. A., Peralta, R. C., Perlner, R. A., Robinson, A. Y., Smith-Tone, D. C., & Alperin-Sheriff, J.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
ORCID
Publisher
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Published
2020-07
DOI
10.6028/nist.ir.8309
OpenAlex
W4254706618
Cited by
296
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 8
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Funders
Information Technology Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
post-quantum cryptography, cryptographic standardization, quantum-resistant algorithms, public-key cryptography, digital signatures, key exchange

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review