Status report on the first round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process
Open accessAbstract
The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the Nation's measurement and standards infrastructure.ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analyses to advance the development and productive use of information technology.ITL's responsibilities include the development of management, administrative, technical, and physical standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of other than national security-related information in federal information systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The standardization of post-quantum cryptosystems is currently underway at NIST.
“The standardization of post-quantum cryptosystems is currently underway at NIST [186].”
From Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): A Comprehensive Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [186]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
NTRU: A ring-based public key cryptosystem
Hoffstein, J., Pipher, J., & Silverman, J. H. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054868 · Cited by 1,947 · see citing works
A Public-Key Cryptosystem Based On Algebraic Coding Theory
McEliece, R. J. (1978) · Deep Space Network Progress Report · Cited by 1,578 · see citing works
Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography
Chen, L., Jordan, S., Liu, Y.-K., Moody, D., Peralta, R., Perlner, R., & Smith-Tone, D. (2016) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8105 · Cited by 1,034 · see citing works
Self-citationSHA-3 standard: permutation-based hash and extendable-output functions
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US) (2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.fips.202 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
(2001) · doi:10.6028/nist.fips.197 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Digital signature standard (DSS)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US) (2013) · doi:10.6028/nist.fips.186-4 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Recommendation for pair-wise key-establishment schemes using discrete logarithm cryptography
Barker, E., Chen, L., Roginsky, A., Vassilev, A., & Davis, R. (2018) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-56ar3 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Recommendation for Pair-Wise Key-Establishment Schemes Using Integer Factorization Cryptography
Barker, E. B., Chen, L., & Moody, D. (2014) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-56br1 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationInteger Version of Ring-LWE and Its Applications
Gu, C. (2019) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0758-8_9 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [4]4. NIST Workshop on Cybersecurity in a Post-Quantum World, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, April 2-3, 2015, https://csrc.nist.gov/Events/2015/Workshop-on-Cybersecurity-in-a- Post-Quantum-World.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits
Gidney, C., & Ekerå, M. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-15-433 · Cited by 830 · see citing works
Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): A Comprehensive Survey
Syed, N. F., Shah, S. W., Shaghaghi, A., Anwar, A., Baig, Z., & Doss, R. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3174679 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
“The standardization of post-quantum cryptosystems is currently underway at NIST [186].”
BackgroundStatus report on the second round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process
Moody, D., Alagic, G., Apon, D. C., Cooper, D. A., Dang, Q. H., Kelsey, J. M., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C. A., Peralta, R. C., Perlner, R. A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8309 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Self-citationStatus report on the third round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization process
Alagic, G., Apon, D., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Dang, T., Kelsey, J., Lichtinger, J., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C., Moody, D., et al. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8413-upd1 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Self-citationStatus report on the fourth round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process
Alagic, G., Bros, M., Ciadoux, P., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Dang, T., Kelsey, J., Lichtinger, J., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C., et al. (2025) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8545 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Self-citationPost Quantum Cryptography: A Review of Techniques, Challenges and Standardizations
Bavdekar, R., Jayant Chopde, E., Agrawal, A., Bhatia, A., & Tiwari, K. (2023) · 2023 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN) · doi:10.1109/icoin56518.2023.10048976 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Abbasi, M., Cardoso, F., Váz, P., Silva, J., & Martins, P. (2025) · Cryptography · doi:10.3390/cryptography9020032 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Szymanski, T. H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3169137 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Federated learning‐based trajectory prediction model with privacy preserving for intelligent vehicle
Han, M., Xu, K., Ma, S., Li, A., & Jiang, H. (2022) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22987 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Post-quantum XML and SAML Single Sign-On
Müller, J., & Oupický, J. (2024) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.56553/popets-2024-0128 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“In our experiment, the SP creates an AuthnRequest with a KEM certificate inside Extensions and signs the AuthnRequest using the post-quantum XML signature.”
MethodInfluential
- Authors
- Alagic, G., Alperin-Sheriff, J., Apon, D., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C., Moody, D., Peralta, R., Perlner, R., Robinson, A., & Smith-Tone, D.
- ORCID
- Published
- 2019-01
- OpenAlex
- W2913851998
- Semantic Scholar
- f99a3a943a3a2b08ae5df498573494730be873f5
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 26
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Funders
- Information Technology Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- post-quantum cryptography, cryptographic standardization, quantum-resistant algorithms, public-key cryptography, digital signatures, key exchange
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
