The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation: the CCM mode for authentication and confidentiality
Open accessAbstract
The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the Nation's measurement and standards infrastructure.ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analyses to advance the development and productive use of information technology.ITL's responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems.This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL's research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security, and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations.Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation: methods and techniques
Dworkin, M. J. (2001) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-38a · Cited by 746
Self-citationWhiting, D., Housley, R., & Ferguson, N. (2003) · doi:10.17487/rfc3610 · Cited by 329
On the Security of CTR + CBC-MAC
Jönsson, J. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36492-7_7 · Cited by 86
A Critique of CCM.Preprint
Rogaway, P., & Wagner, D. A. (2003) · IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive · Cited by 28
Cited by
WirelessHART: Applying Wireless Technology in Real-Time Industrial Process Control
Song, J., Han, S., Mok, A., Chen, D., Lucas, M., Nixon, M., & Pratt, W. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium · doi:10.1109/rtas.2008.15 · Cited by 615
Hossain, E., Khan, I., Un-Noor, F., Sikander, S. S., & Sunny, M. S. H. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2894819 · Cited by 513
A Provable-Security Treatment of the Key-Wrap Problem
Rogaway, P., & Shrimpton, T. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11761679_23 · Cited by 383
Key Reinstallation Attacks: Forcing Nonce Reuse in WPA2
Vanhoef, M., & Piessens, F. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134027 · Cited by 380
Report on lightweight cryptography
McKay, K. A., Bassham, L., Turan, M. S., & Mouha, N. (2017) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8114 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Dworkin, M. J.
- Published
- 2007
- OpenAlex
- W1584498424
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 4
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation: the CCM mode for authentication and confidentiality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6028/nist.sp.800-38c
- The paper
- Dworkin, M. J. (2007). Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation: the CCM mode for authentication and confidentiality. https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.800-38c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.